Indian student enjoying another week of stealing food from Australian charities

The yids are a tiny minority, both monetarily, politically and numerically. If the whites can’t stave off this tiny minority (what is it, 0.38%?), then they’re super hopeless.

Culture is everything.

The Jews have a 15 volume book on how to live, and whose purpose can basically be summed up in “How to get what I want.”

It is filled with duplicitous moral values that are built around a two tiered morality system with one set of rules for Jews in terms of honesty and trust, and a completely different set of rules in respect to their interaction with non-jews.

They are trained from birth to see themselves as wholly separate from the people around them, and completely superior and fated to inherit the earth.

By comparison, Westerners have a culture that values individuality, and that thanks to living in once homogenous societies, don’t think of themselves as a separate people from those around them but as “Every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main“, and their main religious values can basically be boiled down to “Treat people how you would like to be treated” i.e. treat everyone fairly.

Jews and Zionists in particular take advantage of that – if you wanted White People to beat Jews then it would require a complete change in cultural values and ideological thinking….why do you think Jews are so afraid of National Socialism?

Because it changes our culture and ideology into one that see’s us as a collective people. That is how a tiny minority can influence and control a majority – through culture and purposefully keeping them as a fragmented atomised society.

Either you are a lying, self serving Jew or you have no fucking idea woman.

I have read large tracks of the Talmud and I have observed those dual moral values within those texts – how much have you read?

Their texts teach them to remain from others for a variety of reasons – this is because they wish to preserve their own culture and endogamy without being assimilated into whichever society is hosting them – that they have remained a cohesive people despite have no homeland for 2,000 years shows their values work.

There have been thousands of books written about Judaism and their interaction with other people and culture.

History is resplendent with many, many famous people and thinkers warning exactly what I have said, from Dostojevskij, Voltaire, Martin Luther to Henry Ford… yet you, Preachy Peachy who gains all her opinions from the TV thinks it is totally delusional.

I doth my cap to you oh learned one, your feelings must always be right.

I have read none.

Excellent so we have finally established your starting position and knowledge of this subject.

Now go and research it yourself – I’m tired of supply information, links and opinion only to have some uninformed tart call it delusional based purely upon her feelings.

Just be sure to read some genuine criticism of Judaism too – you know for balance… that is if you can ignore your social conditioning long enough to read anything vaguely critical about them without neuroticising about possibly being called antisemitic.

Cult leaders like Martin Luther?
Extremists like Voltaire?
Hate mongers like Dostojevskij?

Go look for it yourself.

Well you might have to get started now, at over 10,000 pages and reading 2 pages a day the typical cycle for a devout Jew reading the Talmud is a 7.5yr cycle.

Contrary to what ignorant Goyim think all but secular & reform Jews regularly read the Talmud. Conservative Jews, generally Zionists and wealthy businessmen type, may not read it as regularly as they did when they were made to when they were young regularly in attending Temple, but many would still read it. Ultra-Orthodox Jews study it non-stop. Throw in the Zohar, which is the spiritual basis for much of the mystic elements of the Kabbalah, then it will take you over a decade (and that is ignoring the large oral tradition that remains unwritten down).

When I said below I have read large tracts of it, that is relative to most people, I’ve only read small parts (most is due to inane things like preparing food or obsessing over women’s periods and state of cleansleness) – but I’m a nerd who likes understanding things so I have actually ended up spending many hours reading it. Once you start it can be something of a rabbit burrow in terms of following it down various holes.

If you are serious in taking a look at it then a good starting place is the Yoreh De’ah – which is basically the catalogue of daily rules that Jews must abide by:

https://www.sefaria.org/Shulchan_Arukh,_Yoreh_De'ah?tab=contents

If you read it you’ll find many examples of Jewish rules and instructions to keep them separate from the populations and other peoples of societies that they inhabit – this shouldn’t be controversial to accept (unless you have been brainwashed) as maintaining “otherness” is an important means of preserving your tribes own endogamy, which they have successfully done for upwards of 2000 years.

This is done through general rules, criticisms of gentiles, implying they are dirty and unclean, and in the Zohar that they are lesser beings.

If you are expecting to read the Torah and find comments and opinions as expressed in anti-Jewish texts like ‘The Talmud Unmasked’ then you will be sorely disappointed.

But what you will find is subtle examples and discussions around issues to do with morality that are strikingly different to Christianity, and which although appearing mild in the sanitised versions of the Talmud that gentiles are able to access, build a moral framework and basis of justification quite different to the sort of societies most people would want to live in.

Take for example Yoreh De’ah 158

https://www.sefaria.org/Shulchan_Arukh%2C_Yoreh_De'ah.158.1?lang=bi&with=Talmud&lang2=en

This is a series of Talmudic discussions on whether it is permissible to kill or do harm to a Goyim. Where as the Christian morality framework make it quite clear, the discussions in these texts are far more ambiguous:

Apropos the notion of raising someone from or lowering him into a pit, the Gemara notes that Rabbi Abbahu taught the following while standing before Rabbi Yoḥanan: With regard to gentiles and shepherds of domesticated animals, one may not raise them from a pit (death)

– Avodah Zarah 26a:17

So not only are gentiles in the same category as shepherds of domestic animals (the lowest recognized category for human), the Jew is not obliged and indeed must not, prevent their death.

But as the Talmud is generally viewed as the process of discussion around an idea or precept, so alternative discussions or thoughts on the subject are also included:

The Gemara answers: There, in that case, how should the tanna teach it? Should he teach it using the terms prohibited and permitted, indicating that a Jew may kill a gentile ab initio? But isn’t it taught in a baraita that with regard to a gentile, and likewise with regard to Jewish shepherds of small livestock, who were typically robbers, one may not raise them out of a pit into which they fell, and one may not lower them into a pit? In other words, one may not rescue them from danger, but neither may one kill them ab initio.

With regard to robbery, the term permitted is relevant, as it is permitted for a Jew to rob a gentile.

– Sanhedrin 57a:17

Hardly conducive for forming a high trust society?

Of course as a discussion that is never settled the preservation of texts like Avodah Zarah would have been expunged from most texts and not made readily available or promoted.

Instead through repeated Talmudic study these because “reasons” and justifications for many of the atrocities that have been committed by Jews.

Another example would be rules around sexual affairs with non-Jews becomes the basis for distinctions of rape (always Jewish women) and lesser sexual assualt, even though the same act has been committed… this two tiered morality is behind the discussions that have been taking place in the Israeli Parliament on the justification of Israeli soldiers is raping their prisoners (the Parliament released some of those soldiers too btw). Where as in Christianity, which doesn’t have that dual morality, such issues don’t exist, it is clear cut – and always wrong.

As you read more and more of the Talmud you’ll see this sort of morality imbued throughout – this is what causes the general dislike of Jews throughout history. There is no smoking gun, but it become apparent where Judaism seeks to move the bar in terms of median thought and reaction to social problems, versus non-Jewish societies.

Anyhow, it is undoubtly a great tool if you wish to preserve your people – however it comes at a great cost… it turns you into a Jew.

(actually Rabbi Harry Waton made this exact claim in his book when he was trying to understand Nazism – I can’t be bothered finding it in the book, but it was somewhere in the first 100 pages)

I’m hoping the English and Irish rebellions become revolutions.

The way politicians in the UK and Europe are openly talking about banning social media, and now actively persecuting citizens who use social media as carriages to the complaints against the Govt and their policies, suggests that they are increasingly worried.

Sadly as I think History would suggest, outright rebellion or violence is probably the most likely avenue for bringing about any meaningful change – as an undying pacifist this option is something I abhor no matter how much I may believe in the inevitability of statements made by the likes of JFK .

*As an interesting append I had a tweet that I used the below image in censored by Twitter for apparently being hateful messaging.

The message accompanying it was simply in reply to someone as to where the blame for the violence in the UK lay, I repointed it away from ‘Far Right’ agitators towards the msm that has mocked and ignored the legitimate grievances of poorer, working class Brits (I might have also mentioned, in the context of the original tweet I was replying to, that it was rumoured Tommy Robison was Israel and Zio funded).

Absolutely – God is irrelevant, Religion is all important because THAT creates God manifest.