EZFKA – or the Economic Zone Formally Known as Australia is a conceptual framework for looking at the post modern economies of Australia and indeed the rest of the West:
“Face facts, we no longer live in a society and nation by the name of Australia – we now live in the ‘Economic Zone Formally Known as Australia’. Once you start looking at social and economic policies through the lens of a MultiCult Mass Migration economic zone, where citizens have been reduced to atomised consumers, and cultural cliques have been inserted into consideration for all aspects of decision making, fracturing what was once previously a relatively homogenous and united society and nation, then EVERYTHING about EZFKA’s Corporatocracy soon starts making sense.”
This is a framework that looks beyond what progressive liberals regularily shoot jizz over as they look around their increasingly atomised, deconstructed nations and full of self importance say to themselves; “We are the inheritors of the enlightenment.”
It is easy to identify other social commentators who celebrate their progressive ideals through the ‘Western Liberal Order’ yet purposefully turn a blind eye to the cancers that are hollowing out our nations, even those who proclaim themselves as heterodox thinkers fall victims to it. Because to think such thoughts and recognise that there are differences in population groups that extend beyond cultural differences is an affront to ‘their’ conditioned values and indoctrinated beliefs.
We know they are indoctrinated, because instead of having fair, good faith discussions over such concepts and issues, which frankly will never be resolved, we are instead told by our elites via their superstructure aka ‘The Cathedral’, that the matter is settled. We are told that not only there are no differences, but if you think or even suspect that some of the differences in life outcomes between population groups may be due to inherent human biodiversity, then you are a bad person.
Basically ‘progressives’ have come to believe that “All men are created equally” is a truism in all respects, legal, cultural and biological, when in fact the enlightened viewpoint was that it was only in the eyes of the law, all men are created equally. This is something that those who were actually responsible for the enlightenment as opposed to calling it down as a justification for their refusal to address unpleasant realities, understood. Outside of that TRUE social construct, law, differences remain – cultural and biodiverse differences that are both real and fundamentally impact that direction and functionality of our societies as these imported differences are added to our social narrative.
The elites resisted the enlightenment because it actually gave power to ordinary people WITHIN THEIR SOCIETY. It was literally a transfer of unfettered power from the elites to the people as “All men were created equally“. This transfer was of course imperfect, in that those of means were still able to wield significant influence, but for a while it worked, because it added the voice of the majority to the social narrative and decision making, not just those who would rule over them. Those who actually passed through the enlightenment also had the luxury of being able to be fairly liberal with their application of these concepts, because they still lived as a majority IN THEIR SOCIETIES due to the lack of mass migration – a reality that only really became available within the past 100 years for most of the West and more importantly accessible for the rest of the world within the past 40 years.
But globalist elites and bankers have been playing this game for a long, loooong time, and no sooner had the West thought that it had won the war over and relaxed its eternal vigilance against ‘a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy’ than that conspiracy set in motion social change that used the very values of the enlightenment to hand them victory over the masses of the West.
Here James Kirkpatrick outlines the process of EZFKA from the US’s point of view, or EZFKA US version:
My revised plan to destroy America would have three parts:
First, make sure ordinary Americans can’t own property and thus build wealth by increasing equity in their homes.
Second, immiserate Americans with low wages and create a second permanent underclass by what President Joe Biden has called “unrelenting” mass immigration.
Finally, systematically teach those groups who are already given special privileges, protections and set-asides by government that they are actually oppressed and need to demand more.
Sounds familiar doesn’t it – it is bleedingly obvious to all, yet when have ANY of you ever heard it uttered by anyone in the mainstream media?
The moment commentators anyone cottons onto this truth, the elites, their catspaws and lick-spittles in the media, their AntiFa bully boys not to mention hysterical over emoting cat ladies, start dog piling on them calling them out as being racist or weak minded conspiracy theorists:
Some people get it, others don’t. Conformists are the death of both civilization, advancement and free societies. Democracy and freedom are ultimately only ever defended by disagreeable people.
I won’t bother repeating more other than providing the link and this final comment, because James Kirtpatrick gets it:
Mass immigration means that we are importing another permanent underclass, incentivized and rewarded by academia, media and the government into destroying American institutions. The “country” will emerge at the other end of this process will be barely worthy of the name. It will be a landmass full of shiftless, random consumers desperately trying to flee each other but trapped by permanent financial serfdom. There will be no uniting culture, ethnicity, or even political myth. There will be just permanent, simmering conflict with an increasingly authoritarian government using naked repression against the naïve white Americans who keep the failed experiment stumbling along.
This is the world that progressive liberals so enraptured with their conceited false belief that the values of the ‘enlightenment’ are as transferable culturally as passing a bowl of soup, as opposed to anchored in biological realities, are ushering in as our future and that of our children. Because they are too afraid of being called out for recognising that truth that the societies we have today are a function of the people who built, not the people imported to consume it.
https://vdare.com/articles/updating-lamm-s-plan-to-destroy-america-end-home-ownership-immiserate-americans-incite-anti-white-hate
Cultural appropriation!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9708827/Angry-shopper-slams-Coles-cultural-appropriation-Indian-samosa-packet.html
erm…
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9710695/Despicable-caf-owners-guilty-rape-warned-lengthy-jail-sentences.html
Imagine if all the people of….oh…South Sudan were magically swapped with the people of Norway. I reckon Norway would immediately become a violent, dysfunctional hell-hole and South Sudan would become an agreeable and prosperous country with good social security. It’s not the geography or the climate that makes a country what it is, it’s the people who live there.
If we import people from these countries, their country doesn’t become like ours, our country becomes like theirs.
I’ve put this idea to a few people, including my partner, and it causes mental lockup that is awesome to behold.
Yes. It’s very difficult to see how importing half of India and Asia can possibly make Australia a better place for the existing Australians. You’ll make it bigger but unwind living standards. I fully expect our economic and political overlords to run Australia into the ground over the coming decades, since as long as Australia is better to live in that most other countries, there will be a queue of people wanting to come live here, and that desire will be exploited for economic gain
It’s not even multicultural by any reasonable definition when two countries make up at least half of the migrant intake over the past 5 years. Assuming being multicultural is desirable, which it isn’t.
Mass migration is the biggest con job out there
I’ll focus on this only:
Ask yourself why is it that Mediterranean nations tend to work less and are somewhat laid back.
Of course that climate majorly affects all aspects of our lives, but it is not the only influence.
My luttle gedankan experiment was a great simplification, but I think it illustrates a fundamental truth.
If fundamental truth is that Swedes would likely become like Sudanese….
That using a ten dollar word to describe a five cent idea is doing things bass-ackwards ?
A Gedanken experiment involves proposing a hypothesis to aid in thinking through the possible consequences. People like Albert Einstein did it all the time.
It seems to me that Sweden is currently implementing the experiment and it’s turning out as I suggested, so maybe the experiment is a useful one.
Lol, deadset over simplified tripe. Fuck you’re an idiot.
Completely ignoring historical facts. You’re right, I have complete mental lock up pondering how you even have a job let alone a partner. You sound like a fuckin 12 year old conceptualizing the world with limited knowledge.
Fuck me dead you cunts come out with some weird and basic dumb shit for apparently successful people.
I find your ad-hominem gibberish incredibly amusing, random internet dude. Please carry on!
You’re a cunt, nuff said.
Oh c’mon. That’s pretty poor quality abuse. I expected better of you.
Looks like we won’t be able to get to Canberra this Friday, annoyingly. Both ACT and NSW have banned non-essential travel for my LGA.
Do point out said historical facts, with references and relevant statistics. Why not write a full post about it? Show us exactly how the uncontrolled introduction of large numbers of random people from anywhere into a pre existing society only ever benefit the society they have joined. I look forward to sharing the references and statistics that I have accumulated over years.
I’m not even touching immigration and cultural intergration you fucking muppet. Swapping the populations of entire countries to different geography and predicting how they’ll turn out is what I’m highlighting, oversimplified bullshit. Pull your head in you absolute fuckwit.
Mr Failing seems to have got out of the wrong side of the bed this morning.
Nah, I just think you’re a fuckin idiot. That’s some dumb shit you wrote, get fucked.
Of course he’s an idiot. He’s the moron from MB that used to get excited annualizing daily movements in Corelogic’s housing index. A complete fkn dunce…much like that retard brenten
Agree. Explains the UK to a tee. We should have seen riots after Rotherham and instead they all muttered under their breath because they were all afraid of being called racist.
More evidence we are ruled by a hostile elite. Increasingly the state enforcement saves its most punitive punishments not for these abusive migrants that they give a slap on the wrist and promise to deport, before releasing back into the community as (((administrative appeals tribunals))) prevent justice being served, but instead save their worst punishments and enforcements against the feed up majority who eventually take matters into their own hands.
oh, come on! 😵💫
The AAT was rolled out in Australia in the 1970s following a directive from the UN – Aust had been relatively slow in implementing these changes prior to Gough and in comparison to the US’s border ‘liberalisation’ following the 1965 Immigration Act. Mainly as it was perceived (correctly) as effectively chipped away at our sovereignty in respect of border control):
The purpose of the AAT is to undermine the sovereignty and effectiveness of national administrators and legal system…. especially in regards to immigration.
Naturally eminent “Australians” and “progressive politicially correct thinkers” are natural candidates to sit on these boards:
https://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2020/01/australia-day-supplementary-links-january-26-27-2020/#comment-3643685
It is a cultural thing – part of the slow game involved in nation stealing, and purposefully designed to disempower the majority who might object to a bunch of street shitting bag snatchers being imported.
That would be the magic soil hypothesis – prod any progressive and you find that essentially is the extent of their argument. Culture and civilization is like a bowl of soup that you can just pass around and knowledge, culture and values are instantly transferred
If you dare to use your Sudaneses Norway example it only tends to enrage them, because by putting the issue in stark undeniable terms it forces them to acknowledge the conceit at the heart of their position – they fundamentally understand that these differences exist, but they can live lives as good people if they pretend they don’t exist.
The fact is that we are different, there is more difference between Sub-Saharan Africans and everyone else in the world, then exists between any other population group. They were genetically isolated from every other human on the planet for 70,000 years or 3,500 generations – it is ridiculous to expect that the feedback loops of environment, culture and genetic trait selection hasn’t resulted in significant differences.
You can domesticate a fox within 12 generations, yet we are meant to believe that there are no significant behavioral or cognitive differences between Europeans and Africans in 3,500 generations!
It is 3,500 generations since we last had a common ancestor, but even then there has been 70,000 of further evolution, plus the admixture of several different archaic hominoid population groups into the two separate groups. In Europeans and Asians, between 2.5-4% of all DNA is descended from Neanderthal and Denvosia linage. While Sub-Saharan Africans have at least TWO further archaic human populations groups that account to up to 17% of their genome – there was virtually no cross over for 70,000 years.
Does this make a difference? Apparently it can make all the difference in some specific traits, for example it is speculated that the superior visual perception abilities found in some non-Africans is attributable to Neanderthal DNA being expressed:
Quite simply it allows people with higher levels of Neanderthal DNA to perceive the world differently to most Africans and many non-Africans without these genes. This is just one example.
Culture matters for our society, but genes only matter in one respect – the honest difference between life outcomes between Africans and practically everyone else.
Stewie, I don’t disagree that there are important biological differences, but I think you underestimate the enduring nature of aspects of culture that get passed on. This applies to animals too. Be it learning the songs of their parents, or what foods are good to eat or not, or how to treat other members of the species, or other species. This can be and has been disrupted. John Stuart Mill in “On Liberty” summed it up (for me at least) thus: “This all but universal illusion is one of the examples of the magical influence of custom, which is not only, as the proverb says, a second nature, but is continually mistaken for the first.”
i don’t underestimate the importance of culture, as I see it as being a driver of human behaviour and thus evolution (culture exists in other animals, eg Killer Whales, however it is less influential on evolution than in humans).
The importance of culture in humans can’t be underestimated, it is the difference between a population group thriving in a society to which they’ve in some ways become symbiotically attached, or dying through deaths of despair and sense of anomie.
It is also one of the reasons why I am so opposed to immigration carried out under the auspices of MultiCult.
Australia is a white country. It was founded by white Christian Europeans, and if we are to use the language of the hateful woke, then it is a country steeped in whiteness.
With the exception of large scale African migration I don’t care where a migrant comes from other than that when they come to Australia they come here under the understanding that they, or at least their children and grandchildren are going to become and identify as white Australians in the context I’ve described.
If they plan to come here and establish communities here as Muslim Afghanis or Chinese Imperialists, and seek to perpetuate their values here in conflict with my own, then they should get the fuck out and go back to whatever shit hole their cultures and values produced.
Also, I look up the domesticated silver fox. I like this and have saved for the future. It squares up nicely with Calhoun’s behavioural sink. If you put animals in cramped situations their natural behaviours stop and things get weird. Most foxes don’t breed in captivity, true also of many other animals. IMO, the evidence from urbanisation is similar. Even Indians and Nigerians are breeding less than they used to.
Shit bro, where’s the references for these statements you make in this full post of yours. Fuckin idiot lol
Click on Stewie’s link. Google “Calhoun behavioural sink”. Google fertility rates for India and Nigeria. Draw your own conclusions, offer an alternative interpretation.
That’s not references dickhead, don’t demand them of me if you won’t provide them yourself. Classic internet bullshit. Fuckin idiot.
Why you so angry, Winnifred? Out of 9 f-bombs dropped in the comments here, 7 are yours.
mare you OK?
Are you reading the shit written here? It’s just fucking stupid, hence the fucking fucks.
LSWCHP’s first comment is just ludicrous, absolutely juvenile. If he wants to say he doesn’t like foreigners and believes integration doesn’t work, just fucking say it. But some lame as fuck simpleton premise as his is just fuckin stupid, dead set stupid.
And that robert cunt is an idiot, nuff said. Asking for references from someone when you don’t provide them yourself…. laughable.
All these cunts whinge about MB being an echo chamber, this place is now mostly a fringe race theory and general old white cunts whinging echo chamber. Someone has to tell these cunts to get fucked and when I have the time I do.
Y’all fuckheads have fun now.
Lmao u are such a dik head, u talk about how we’re hypocrites with no position to attack MB but if we were really like them ud of been banned years ago
Have fun in dubbo you bin scabbing social outcast, neck up cunt.
u r gay
That’s lame, not necessarily an insult at all.
“Ur gay” your arse.
A faggot otoh is a different proposition. You could say that he’s an inbreed, goat fucker, sis-lover or whatever else but to call someone a gay is….
overthinkin it bruz
best insults are shit like “ur gay” etc
I do agree with you there bin scab
You both are lame, I therefore must conclude.
At least I got you two to agree on something,
W@F is just a variation of your garden variety specimen you find on the Loony Left in spades.
They have all grown up thinking they are special, which has given them a sense of entitlement. They secretly crave what some other people have, big house, nice car. But due to their horrible personality and making the wrong choices in life, or just plain laziness, they can’t have what they feel they deserve.
After having made those wrong decisions and living a dead end life, they don’t look inward to see if maybe they have any flaws, and how they could improve themselves. No, it’s much easier to blame something else, ‘the system’, ‘the patriarchy’, ‘the corporations’ et cetera, anything except themselves, because that would shatter their fragile ego.
Due to his loser life W@F has developed a false sense of kinship with the other ‘oppressed’ peoples, which of course makes him laughable and pathetic.
Lol cool story man. Fuck you’re stupid.
Have another get fucked as well.
this thread is hilarious 🤣
If you are presenting this based on studies done in America then there is a much larger and more significant selection event that happened much more recently. People of african descent in the US are predominantly descended from slaves, i.e. people that were the ones caught and transported by the slave traders. What sort of selection pressure do you think that applied? The best and brightest got caught?
That is a good point actually, one which I’ve looked into and considered before.
There is a large region that runs through the middle of Africa which is infested with Tsetse Fly that while the soil is very fertile prevents cattle and many domesticated animals from surviving (environment).
This also coincides with the Matriarchal belt, where land, ect is owned by the women, who do all the work and men are reduced to preening peacocks (culture) lazing around and doing very little else. There was little in the way of organised states in these areas, relative to other areas in Africa including other sub-Saharan regions that aren’t infested with Tsetse fly.
This made it relatively easy pickings for slavers in both the Atlantic and much nastier Indian slave trades. To this day those regions of Africa are typified by one parent families, and it is speculated that the high sourcing of slaves in this area contributed to genetic behaviours (genes) that account for a degree of the prevalence of single parent families in African Americans.
It is also a good example of the feedback loop between environment, culture and genes.
I had assumed that the bulk of the slaves were not “caught” by the white slavers, but were captured by locals in the course of local warfare & then sold to the white traders.
no?
They were mainly caught by other black Africans then sold to white ‘merchants’ involved in the slave trade…. as with all unsavoury international trade, from drug running to prostitution ‘merchants’ formed a significant portion of the slave industry, indeed dominated it, relative to other European participants.
https://christiansfortruth.com/jewish-dominance-of-the-african-slave-trade/
https://noirg.org/articles/jewish-role-in-slavery-explained-in-a-map/
There was a reason why slave markets were open every day of the week except Saturdays.
A nice subtle and succinct way…
👌👌👌
Quite possibly, but does that change the result? I would say it further increases the likelihood that the best were not going to end up as slaves and therefore in the US for studies than if europeans turned up and took everyone they could find and catch.
This of course assumes warfare is determined by intelligence in some way, but I’d say that is fairly likely.
I dunno, could be quite the opposite.
Perhaps the warlike tribes of meatheads tended to raid and enslave the (relatively softer) local tribe of artists needs and philosophers…?
The meatheads tend to end up in these if they annoy the people with the smarts too much.
Meatheads have never been very successful when pitted against smarts.
Elite military units today tend to be full of high IQ people, not meatheads as brute force really doesn’t work very well compared with intelligent use of strengths and weakness of yourself and your enemy.
Source:
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/facts-about-slavery/
I have no clue of reliability of the source, it just offers another perspective
Of this is even true, it is just a small fraction of the big picture.
South African tribes were easier to divide and “capture” but were generally slow, fat and short in comparison to central Africa muscular strong men and women.
The tech available to captors was by far advanced at the time westworld was developing on the back of slave trade and colonialism. It would’ve been easy peasy for English crown and US to abduct and enslave undeveloped nations at the time – and I am certain the only choice was health and strength to endure several months without food and minimal water across Atlantic.
This implies that all are equally easy to catch.
Despite many attempts europeans have failed the world over to completely wipe out native populations, despite a massive advantage technologically. Everywhere that they came and displaced the locals wars broke out.
It’s like the old proverb.
Why are you putting on running shoes, you çan’t outrun the lion.
I don’t need to outrun the lion, I only need to outrun you.
I don’t agree with implied part.
Southern Africans would’ve been easier to enslave because of those traits as per previous generalisation.
Quality of slaves steming from physical and mental traits is the key ingredient.
I also don’t see anything to support a desire by western cultures to wipe out colonised populations and a source of slave labour. It is like saying a cattle farmer’s aim was to slaughter and wipe out cattle.
You aren’t looking very hard.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide_of_indigenous_peoples
I dont deny that in places where a substitution was the target that indigenous people were open for 100% culling, like this place.
I pointed that where indigenous people were seen as a commodity (Africa), there could’ve been little initiative for extermination.
i think this is a possibility, the idea is that african americans are actually downward selected from overall africans, as they probably derived from lower status ppl, so you can’t extrapolate them to other SS-africans (also bc they’re ~20% white)
I was hoping someone would recognise the Magic Dirt thesis, which I believe is attributable to the great John Derbyshire.
John Derbyshire, I had to google him. I read a lot but I don’t necessarily associate ideas with specific thinkers, I just tend to absorb stuff that makes sense like ‘magic dirt‘, which is probably how I’ve come across the term before without actually being aware of who he was. Paleoconservative – there you go, that isn’t a term I’ve heard for a while. Interesting cultural traits they assign as values to that form of conservative. Makes you wonder where the Neoconservatives pull their values…
It probably is difficult to come up with a way to respond to that sort of racism and stupidity (and aren’t you supposed to be a uni prof or something ?), especially for someone you care about (it is for me whenever my parents regurgitate whatever the outrage of the week is on Sky News), so a “mental lockup” is understandable.
They’re probably just being polite. Do they try to immediately change the subject ?
I’d give your views a bit more credit if you would explain why my thought experiment is wrong, rather than just assuming a posture of virtuous superiority and calling me racist and stupid. You say it’s difficult, but give it a shot. See what happens. Maybe you could change my mind.
It’s like that old joke:
“How do I get to a good gedanken?”
“Well, I wouldn’t start from there.”
That magic dirt y’all are circle jerking around upthread ? NOBODY ACTUALLY THINKS THAT.
Of course nobody actually thinks there’s magic dirt – but ya wanna know what? It is a fucking joke that works, because it highlights no one in the fucking media, or the politicians or any other talking head that gets their views put forward to the rest of the populationm while advocating for 3rd world (African) immigration have ANY explanation or given any consideration as to how a bunch of stubble headed, spear chucking savages from African are gunna adapt to life in modern Western nations.
The reality is they never fucking do.
The US has had them for 300 years and they are still chimping out burning cities down when their thugs get arrested and die of drug over doses. They commit violent crimes like murder at TEN TIMES the rate of white people and nearly 20 times the rate of East Asians. They can’t even drive cars without being 3 times more likely to crash them. The UK imported them in the 1960s from the Caribbean and they commit crimes and violence at EXACTLY the same disproportional rates as the US. Same in Sweden, same in Germany, same in Melbourne.
They run amok. Rob house, rob people, bash soft elderly targets and generally fuck up function societies EVERYWHERE THEY GO. Africans are social entropy, they destroy functional societies. Where a significant number of Africans live in a community outside of Africa, they turn that location into a fucking shit hole.
Cunts like you have no answer other than shrugging your shoulders and pulling you arse cheeks apart so as to get reamed by bunch of needy 3rd worlders, and blaming their needy, stupid, greed on some imaginary, trace residual elements of racism in the countries that they are literally killing themselves to get into, solely in order to grab a piece of it, when the fact is as a population group that Sub-Saharan Africans are DUMBER and more VIOLENT than any other on earth.
That circle jerk – its people like you, blaming it all on microscopic levels of racism, intolerance or whiteness and ignoring the biological reality that after 70,000 years of genetic isolation Africans are 1/4 to 1/3 removed from us as the Neanderthals were to our last common direct ancestors.
But hey, Africans do offer cunts like you one thing that you value – the opportunity to look morally magnanimous, so here’s your fuckin badge:
Stewie, it’s one thing to be raw, it’s another thing to be mean.
stubble headed, chimping out … 😕
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsU2YYeWtrM
Peachy,
Please search for:
THE CANNIBAL WARLORDS OF LIBERIA (FULL LENGTH DOCUMENTARY)
on BitChute and watch the first 5 minutes if nothing else.
When I post link it auto deletes after put in ‘waiting for approval’.
I’m a little scairt!
😀 No need to!
It’s a Vice documentary from before Vice went off the rails.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRuSS0iiFyo&vl=en
You created this website to foster these unflushable turds and you’re… sad? upset? disappointed? one has bobbed up ?
and yet you’re here regularly.
Welcome to the Unflushable turds club and thank you for taking the lead
I suspect the Professor is in the house!
I get confused.
A “Dr” professor?
His title of Doctor is an honorary one, he is neither a Medico or a Philosopher, rather I deduced it was ironically bestowed upon him by his mates no doubt after one of his long lectures as in “Okay Doctor Smith, we get the idea.”
I call him the Professor because well, he professed it. ROFLMAO
Mkay, that clears what I already thought it was but was unsure
Edit:
Nope, she won’t come. She needs a safe space where censorship is strongest argument
Are you sure? There is only one person I’ve encountered before who so persistently and publicly mentions his shame of having parents who commit the thought crime of watching ‘Sky News’.
Not sure what your repsonse relates too.
DrSmithy never explicitly said anything about his sex (or lack of it), as well as strange beyond-reasonable obsession with homos, wafting like (s)he’s in bed with Skippy (too many tangents) or it is alter ego of the same physical person.
I mean I am not trying to be judgmental, I could not care less of other people’s sexual preferences or biases, it is just an observation.
Smithy will never post here. He’d be devoured without censorship safety net and he knows it. Same for Skippy.
Again, their choice. Some just don’t like a debate or discussion
the liberal monopoly on ‘the enlightenment’ is a mischaracterisation as well; in truth, the enlightenment spawned two other great ideologies along with liberalism, being fascism, socialism. it’s easy now to see liberalism as the only true path, but there were times when both fascism and socialism presented serious challenges. liberalism has clearly been decaying and corrupting for some time, which makes me wonder whether a political system that really has only existed in practice for a hundred years or less (in only some parts of the world) is really the be all and end all its proponents make it out to be.
Monarchy keeps cropping up for a reason!
Saw this earlier and had a lol at how very EZFKA it was. Median house prices extrapolated to 2043…
What a chart. I can’t see $6.4m for Sydney because wages growth won’t be there to support mortgage serviceability, even with 0% interest rates.
Someone can model this but the cash rate would need to be negative 7% or something plus decent wages growth to get there.
My dart on the board would say $2.5-3m is within reach however.
There would be people in EZFKA that would take that chart as gospel. They believe in the property religion “property prices double every 7 years” and will be going all in on houses.
Sometimes I feel like I’m living in the real life version of the movie Idiocracy… 2043: Nathan Birch will be the wealthiest Australian and probably PM too.
Buy now or miss out forever!
a FOMOF???
just lol, its scary that i feel as though things have ascended to such absurd levels this is actually possible
Is that a forecast or unofficial policy?
Right on cue. Check the comments from the property developer. A true EZFKONIAN.
https://www.watoday.com.au/national/western-australia/stretching-pulling-perth-property-expert-calls-for-end-to-city-s-sprawl-at-expense-of-cbd-20210621-p582yc.html
lols the war on “sprawl” is pure ezfka- land supply restrictions, “upbuilding” by increasing density in already developed areas (which takes 50505050 years and never outpaces demand), only result is prices to the fuckin mooooooooooooooon as no one ends up with anywhere to live as a consequence
Noice!
At least the comments are on point in that article. Turns out everyone is sick to death of self interested developers. Pity the average prole has no real say in anything.
in other news on a more positive note, this behemoth got knocked back. Sucked in Harry:
https://www.smh.com.au/national/meriton-s-mega-development-plan-for-1900-apartments-in-little-bay-rejected-20210618-p582cb.html
Not sure that’s a more positive note, just reinforces that the already wealthy get preferential treatment.
Pretty much. Grattan institute keeps advocating densification of the middle ring ie where non wealthy live.
Little bay and the whole area down that way is a bit of a mixed area though, it’s not the eastern suburbs. Yes mostly white but I wouldn’t consider it to be upper middle class necessarily either.
https://www.realestate.com.au/neighbourhoods/little-bay-2036-nsw
median house price $1.915mill rent $1100/week
https://www.realestate.com.au/neighbourhoods/lidcombe-2141-nsw
median house$1.2mill $600 rent.
I wouldn’t call little bay middle class based on costs.
Maybe it was 30 years ago, but things change. All of the terraces in inner sydney were heavily working class at one point.
Yeah but how many are buying at current prices? By definition most people in a suburb bought at prices from the past not today. It was probably still a $1m suburb 10 years ago granted but it’s no Randwick etc.
Guess it also depends on how you define upper middle class also – asset values or income.
Scum.
Lines are blurred.
Crossing between ideas of a limited immigration and “wrong” ethnicities rejection is what makes everything being pasted with a racism easier. Racists will oppose some or all non desired immigrant cultures but support unlimited immigration from selected choice.
It cannot be racism if ethnic and cultural quotas are introduced because it allows better absorption into host culture. But if that quota is not supported when it comes to Brits and Yanks then we have….
Our elite are pretty much wedded to mass immigration, where they differ is who they want and what visas. To ensure a certain elite group gets what they want they conflate racism with an opposing immigration and visa view.
Well they kept this one nice and quiet.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9711219/Melbourne-stabbing-inquest-Chilling-details-emerge-Kew-attack-Chris-Polden-Sally-Anne-Wills.html
At least they smoked the miserable piece of shit.
I wish you’d get smoked….
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery…
In truth I stole it from them, in order to make a point comment on the ‘Western Liberal Order’ an those who refer to it, as though it were really Western, really Liberal and really an Order.
The reality is there no ‘West’ any more, nor any liberal order. It is a corporatocracy that holds onto power by encouraging the pursuit of hedonism and self interest over charity and responsibility, and exists solely in order to provide a facade of legitimacy to a contrived philosophical and economic means of pillaging and destroying our underlying societies by a hostile elite.
Or in other words, money is our real god now.
The tv show American God’s revolves around this idea.
I was sure your article came out first… :p
Nah – they use it regularly.
Aha, so the tables are turned. It is Stewie who is the shameless flatterer!
lol
I’ll take your word for it. I guess I don’t really read embee that much these days.
Should also say 100+ comments on a non-weekend links article is also quite impressive!
Really? The majority of comments is right tard circle jerking on hating darkies couched in fake science. It reads like a /pol thread and those cunts pump out way more comments per thread.
“fake science”
The science is solid, in that it has been agreed on by the majority of scientists and psychologists on both sides of the debate that difference in IQ between population groups exists.
Indeed if “g” or general intelligence doesn’t exist, then all other psychology theories explaining other traits are even more suspect, given there is far, far less evidence and testing to support them.
The only ‘scientific’ questions that is up for debate in regards to the cause of the “g” gap – is it natural i.e. residual genetic differences or environmental i.e. oppression.
The irony is that in regards to the two sides of this debate, the real science, lets call it the HBD side, is actually on the side of natural differences. The opposing view is from those on environment side, we’ll call the CRT viewpoint, this is 100% dependent on untestable theories – true ‘junk science’. Mainly resting on the circular reasoning that “Gaps in outcome exist, therefor the existence of these gaps is evidence of oppression.”
The ideas and concepts behind their assertions are completely unsubstantiable, like systemic racism or microagressions, etc that are completely invisible and unmeasurable by anyone other than an individual highly train in Grievance studies from some University, and whose main evidence that these supposed ’causes’ exist, is the existence of the gaps that are supposedly being measured.
All of this would be something of an interesting debate if it weren’t for the fact that one side is desperately trying to suppress this knowledge, and paint those that quite reasonably support the scientific conclusions as evil and hateful, simply because they suggest that nature is unfair and life, for some, is fundamentally unequitable.
The result is, that it causes a great many people to falsely believe our societies are evil and that certain groups are acting in collusion to suppress others, generating understandable angst, outrage and dysfunction.
I use to think that it was just ignorance on those who want to see the world as being fundamentally equitable, in terms of the religious view that ‘All men are created equal’, but now I think that only explains the position of those lower at the lower end of the Bell curve and the Dunning-Kruger midwits like Thanassis Veggos who are so easily enamored by the big words and incomprehensible texts that sociologists put out in order to justify their ridiculous explanations, and which accord with their own emotional need to feel the world is unjust.
I’ve grown to believe that the smart people who support the ‘Environment’ thesis as an explanation for the persistence of these gaps, are doing so purely in order to obtain power over the rest of us.
They use the persistence of these gaps in otherwise fundamentally fair and equitable notions that existed in most Western European nations, relative to all other civilizations (short of subsistence hunter gathers) as a cudgel to beat down those who stand in their way and to gain power over the majority.
You should take a read of this synopsis of the latest book by Charles Murray – it is a real eye opener. Having finally just finished David Rieich’s “Who We Are and How We Got Here” I’m looking forward to reading this one:
https://vdare.com/articles/two-cheers-for-charles-murray
I think for the most part comments have been respectful aside from Mig wanting to fight everyone and a few people swearing at each other using language that would likely be unacceptable on MB.
With platforms like these, I suspect that viewers are less interested in the articles themselves as opposed to the thoughts of others – hence higher comment numbers for whatever reason may cause people to look and possibly contribute. Over time, I would expect this to even out and it’s a positive that there are more new names appearing.
One thing I’ve noticed is that at times Peachy (and others too) take the time to reply to and welcome new members – it’s this level of engagement that makes EZFKA more promising as opposed to constant demand to “subscribe.” To me MB has stagnated – DLS is still going on about MPLOL, and now LVO has gone with an anti-Dan Andrews slant that is more in common with the Baxendale/Elsworth school of twitter gaslighting. Maybe they’ve been going on too long or have enough subs to just phone it in. This isn’t to say EZFKA is perfect or won’t end up in the same boat, but at least for now I feel like it’s taking steps and will continue to improve.
Too right, the real debate about this is always suppressed by cries of racist or similar, we should be investigating this more and getting to solution of how we can actually change the situation rather than throwing money and tolerance at the problem.
(emphasis added)
The trick is that there is no universal “we”.
the “we” (we#1) who should be investigating and changing things is presumably the government.
but the “we” (we#2) for whom there is a problem is the pleb EZFKA units.
They are different groups. We#1 can investigate and change things but sees no problem. We#2 sees a problem but has no power to investigate or change jack.
neat, huh?
it’s the EZFKA way.
https://www.greaterfool.ca/
no canada day huh? dopey woke beavers