Julian Assange granted full asylum in Australia after murdering pregnant woman

I could be Indian, like you?

Nah, I’d be Sri Lanakan in that case.

No point being the same as the bottom of the human cesspool you are.

let’s just say that Timbo will not observe this when creating the next “look, immigrant raping there!” post.
Doh, the name is not an “immigrant” name so nothing there to see???

81% of aus population types accounts for near 100% of the child rape in this pond and at the same time holds the world record in:
1) the number of different children raped by a single person [91],
2) the number of coitus per child [18 coitus per each of the 91 kids],
3) the length of child rape going unreported by rapist’s 81%er colleagues [almost a decade]

Kids in this pond seems to have a comparative zero chance of being raped by the remaining 19%

Do I need to point you to census data so that you can see what ethnic groups adds-up to 81%?

I don’t have any defence for that. What defence can any normal person have for rape, let alone kids rape?
Plenty have it on ethnicity alone to the absolute exclusion of all other factors. I pointed to cases of Paul Douglas Frost and Ashley Paul Griffith to point the hypocrisy where a comparably lesser crime is creating a greater outrage than a case that should’ve brought the nation on its feet demanding lynch.

The case you linked is only indirectly related to animals like Paul Douglas Frost or Ashley Paul Griffith. Mostly in that it involves children and that they went unpunished for years. Oh, and also that the actual dick that went into a kid was of “westerner provenance”
The categories of “organised crime in a deviant cuntry” and “your next door neighbour bangs your toddler for years in your local childcare and colleagues do not report him” are not quite comparable. I am happy to retort if you indicate how do you compare the two cases as otherwise I’d be speculating on your viewpoint.

Don’t get fired up please, it ruins arguments and argumentation.
tl;dr applies for below.
Summary for negatively intellectualed persons at the end.

I didn’t mean “west pakis”.
I meant what I said and what it said on your link and then used that as a common denominator with our own participants in this notorious championship:
“In August 2014 the Jay report concluded that an estimated 1,400 children had been sexually abused in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013, predominantly by British-Pakistani men.”
and
“majority of the perpetrators were British Muslims specifically British Pakistanis”
“predominantly” and “mostly” is a bit vague but it should mean between 1/5 and 1/3 were NOT pakis.
So yes, there’s no doubt the Pakis who organised that but particularly those who paid for rape of children are the bottom of the cesspool of humanity (including those on the outside who kept it all under the lid).
Also equally the same there is no exculpation for the remaining substantial offenders. It is clear they are the westerners.

So when lots of foreign pedos join forces to rape children, that becomes organised crime…

Yes,
foreign or not foreign or combined.
See what you said: “join forces“. Now compare that to “organised” and the difference is really in the very fine detail
From the very first sentence on that article it says:

The Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal consists of the organised child sexual abuse

I hope that answers the doubt of Rotterham child rape being an organised crime

…totally different from a single non-foreign pedo raping children

I did not say it is totally different, I said “are not quite comparable”.
One is opportunistic or partially organised for sexual and/or insignificant personal financial gain but its main feature is mental involvement with a victim and absence or lower concurrent victims. That’s just to name a few.
Other is organised predominantly and primarily for financial gains. It readily involves 3rd parties as providers, organisers and customers, Children are just an exploited commodity in the scheme. Exactly as depicted in the article on Wikipedia.
The later one being by definition incomparably worse crime.
I don’t make distinction between foreign and non-foreign pedos. If someone’s kid is raped, what condolence does it make if the rapist is of the same ethnicity. If anything, in normal cultures when one of own commits a heinous crime it is taken as far worse. This because it smears all the members with his shyte.

The point I want to make is in the last sentence of the previous reply “…hypocrisy where a comparably lesser crime is creating a greater outrage than a case that should’ve brought the nation on its feet demanding lynch.”. It is the disproportional and apparent obliviousness to two distinct domestic beasts Paul Douglas Frost and Ashley Paul Griffith vs. the national level rage over release of a single heinous crime person. it pushes really hard to say that home brewed child rapists are acceptable or lesser evil
Other point was really to piss on the thick rosy glasses taken for observing the superior race as omnipresent here. Hence the handle.
Also, the child rape danger from your 81% neighbour base is far greater than that from the characters like pakis for the simple fact that next time you leave your kid in that childcare or the swimming lesson or whatever place you though was sacred safe grounds, there may be a Paul Douglas Frost or Ashley Paul Griffith waiting in the shadows, not being reported by his compatriots. I hope that though stays whenever you leave your kid with someone thinking is safe.

With this extensive response misplaced to an inappropriate blog, i am sure there will be little or no chance for someone to ‘catch me’ where I said something wrong.

~~~~~~~
for those with “inversely increased” intellect and for tl;dr mob:
don’t bother, go to a local rsl and play keno all night.