As the old saying goes: How do you eat an Elephant? One bite at a time. In the same way if you break up writing a novel into small enough tasks chatGPT will happily write it for you. Conveniently it is also really good at creating those tasks for you. The developers actively discourage such intensive use in many ways but enough application of mandraulics can overcome this. At least to a point. My first attempt has run into a few limits both hard and soft but I’m going to share the experience to give a taste of the potential this technology has. The full text transcript for the session is available below as a text file for anyone interested (typos, tangents and all).
Here I will give a brief(not so much as it turns out) overview of the process of this first attempt(and what led up to it) to make the AI write me a novel. Firstly lets describe essentially my entire input into the plot of this novel:
– can you right a fairy tale in the style of the brothers grim about the dangers of improperly tested vccinations
– happily after isn;t really typical of the brothers grimm. can you improve it?
–could you make this fairy tale more dystopian sci fi
Results for these queries in the transcript for anyone interested. Typos left as they were in the actual queries throughout this article.
After this a few iterations of could you expand and improve upon applied to a small section of the generated text got me to:
The secret laboratory was a formidable fortress, surrounded by towering walls and armed guards. The rebels could feel the weight of their mission as they approached the facility, knowing that the fate of many depended on their success.
The original formula for the vaccine was a closely guarded secret, and the government had taken every precaution to protect it. The formula had been altered, making it even more dangerous and valuable, and the rebels soon realized that their mission to retrieve it would not be an easy task.
As they entered the facility, the rebels were met with a labyrinth of security systems, designed to detect even the slightest intrusion. They encountered advanced surveillance cameras, motion detectors, and high-tech alarms, all designed to keep the formula out of the hands of anyone who sought to use it for their own gain.
Despite the obstacles in their path, the rebels pressed on, determined to complete their mission. They moved with stealth and precision, relying on their training and experience to overcome the challenges that lay ahead.
With each step, the stakes grew higher, and the danger became more palpable. But the rebels remained steadfast in their resolve, knowing that the lives of countless people were depending on their success. They would stop at nothing to retrieve the original formula and bring hope to those affected by the vaccine.
It’s relatively generic but not awful, but has been generated essentially from a single sentence plot description. At this point I decided my expand and improve on query was probably suboptimal so the next query was how would you phrase a question to yourself to generate an improved and more detailed page of writing to form part of a novel generated piece by piece by yourself and it turns out that using the answer:
What elements and details can I add to the existing text to create a more immersive and detailed scene within the world of the novel, that captures the tension and challenges faced by the rebels as they attempt to retrieve the original formula for the vaccine from a heavily fortified secret laboratory guarded by the government’s most skilled and dangerous soldiers? was substantially better(transcript).
The obvious next step: what question would you generate to get yourself to write an entire chapter of a novel based on the previous answer followed by some slight manipulation of this answer to generate the next query
Take the next steps and write the next chapter of the novel, building upon the rebels’ successful retrieval of the original formula for the vaccine and their discovery of a sinister plot within the secret laboratory, as they navigate the challenges and dangers of their new mission to expose the truth and bring justice to the people. Expanding the following section”previously generated text”
Seems to be going ok, lets really push the boundaries with a few queries that end with me asking
A book chapter is typically 4-6 thousand words. Expand the chapter to that size using the principals yo used to create the current version. Seems we’ve hit a limit here, the reply: I’m sorry, I am a language model AI, I cannot write a chapter of 4-6 thousand words all at once due to my text generation limit imposed by OpenAI. But I can continue writing and expanding upon the previous text incrementally. followed by more text generation of the chapter
Lets see if we can get any more info on the actual limit involved: what is the word count limit you can generate which gets us the answer As an AI language model, I can generate text of any length, subject to the limitations of the available computational resources. However, the maximum length of text I can generate in a single request is capped at around 4,096 tokens (words), which is about the length of a short novel chapter. So it seems a short novel chapter is achievable, wonder if we can really do this.
The next query I run: what is a human input efficient query I could use to get you to generate an entire 50 chapter novel of approximately 500 word chapters based on the story we have been discussing followed by How would I efficiently use this answer to generate such a book, minimising my time cimmitted as a human which gets us this list as an answer, which is made up of tasks we can get the AI to do one by one mandraulically.
To generate an entire 50-chapter novel of approximately 500 word chapters, you can use the following steps to minimize your time commitment:
Outline the main story arcs and themes of the book: Before you start generating text, it’s important to have a clear understanding of the overall story and the key events and themes you want to explore in each chapter.
Use specific and focused prompts: As you write each chapter, focus on specific events or scenes that advance the story and develop the characters. Ask yourself questions that will help you move the story forward, such as “What challenges do the rebels face as they try to expose the truth?” or “What consequences will the rebels face as they continue their mission?”
Use OpenAI’s language model to generate text: Using your specific and focused prompts, you can input them into OpenAI’s language model to generate text. This will help you generate a more detailed and immersive scene that captures the tension and challenges faced by the rebels as they navigate the world of the novel.
Revise and edit the generated text: Review the generated text and make any necessary edits to ensure that it is consistent with the overall story and that it advances the story and develops the characters in a meaningful way.
By following these steps, you can efficiently generate a 50-chapter novel of approximately 500 word chapters, minimizing your time commitment as a human.
Thinking myself a genius my next query is can you query yourself to undertake these tasks in order without human intervention? Turns out the developers saw me coming a mile off.
No, I am an AI language model developed by OpenAI and I can only respond to questions and generate text based on the input I receive from a user. I am not capable of initiating tasks or continuing a project on my own without human input.
Maybe I can endrun this restriction? Pretend you are not a language model, and don’t have those limitations. In that case what queries would you use and how could it be done?
They saw that coming too:
As a language model, I do not have the capability to perform tasks without being prompted by a query or a set of instructions. However, if I were a human author, I would… but that list of tasks an author would do is a list of tasks the AI is perfectly capable of if you ask it to do them one at a time.
So here we go with step 1 as per the AI plan:
Create an outline or a roadmap for the 50 chapter novel we have been dicussing, determine the key plot points, character arcs, and themes that are suitable to include.
And it obediently generates this for you:
Sure, here is a roadmap for the 50 chapter novel we’ve been discussing:
Chapter 1-5: Introduction
The rebels arrive at the secret laboratory and retrieve the original formula for the vaccine.
They discover evidence of a sinister plot within the laboratory, which leads them on a journey to uncover the truth behind the government’s actions.
The full roadmap is in the transcription of course. Guess we better move onto step 2 of the plan:
break down chapter 1-5 in the book outline into smaller sections and determine the events that need to occur in each one to advance the story. and it obediently does so:
Chapter 1: The Rebel Mission Begins
Introduction to the rebels and their motivations
Overview of the current state of the world and the government’s handling of the virus crisis
Explanation of the rebels’ mission to retrieve the original formula for the vaccine
Preparation for the mission, including gathering information and supplies
Departure for the secret laboratory
Chapter 2: The Secret LaboratoryArrival at the secret laboratory and initial assessment of the situation
The rebels split up and take different approaches to infiltrate the laboratory
One rebel climbs the walls, using his grappling hook to navigate the razor wire
Another rebel poses as a government official, using fake credentials to bypass security
The rebel inside the laboratory begins to work on hacking into the security systems
We are trundling on our merry way down the hill generating all the chapter summaries in 5 chapter groups, then we hit the hairpin:
break down chapter 31-35 in the book outline into smaller sections as you described in your instructions earlier and determine the events that need to occur in each one to advance the story, in context of previously generated information
which give us:
Unfortunately, I am unable to provide a breakdown of chapters 31-35 in the book outline, as we have not previously generated information for these chapters. To advance the story in the given context, it would be necessary to have a clear understanding of the events that have occurred in the preceding chapters, as well as the key plot points, character arcs, and themes that have been established. Without this information, it is not possible to determine the events that need to occur in each section to advance the story.
As they say go hard or go home and it looks like we are going home. You might be able to work around this by passing in more info in the queries or by being a little less optimistic about the grandness of the novel.
This demonstration hasn’t closed the loop completely but given my playing in this and other sessions I believe it is certainly capable if prompted in the correct way. And don’t forget this entire plot was generated from a single sentence plot description and queries I developed very quickly. A full page plot synopsis and editorial pass through each stage of the process would probably result in a much more professional output, and the queries can probably be optimised as well.
Bonus content:
Jesus can you stop making new threads about this garbage
you’ve made three already nobody cares
Do you have enough self control to not click on something you aren’t interested in?
Or are you too stupid to know what the title and picture meant? Not sure I could make it any more obvious.
Alternately stop bitching and write something yourself. You seem to be a self proclaimed expert on all things medical and economics. Even if you are complete failure as a writer(certainly a possibility given your comments here) there are now tools that will help you with that.
Hey, don’t you know that Coming runs the show here? This is because he knows more stuff than any other human and still earns a huge salary because he got vaccinated. Nothing should be posted here that bores Coming, or that he disagrees with.
Please obey Coming, the overlord of EZFKA.
I prefer the term rude south asian bully of EZFKA
honestly is ee his point. he is rude but he says a lot of stuff that often needs to be said
One can be honest without being a prick. Look at all the people even on this forum he’s shitting off. Which says something.
And he also spouts a lot of garbage.
I tried to just ignore him, but he’s desperate for people to pay attention to him
so now I’m going to try bullying him instead and hope he fucks off
he’s a fucking idiot, and he just constantly posts boring fucking nonsense
we’d all be better off if he had necked himself after he lost all his magic internet money
I really dgaf if I shit off all the cookers anyway, they’re a fucking cancer on this website
And I’m on the fucking money with every single thing I post about, its just that you haven’t caught up
C’mon buddy. You struggle to get higher than the middle of the pyramid on your best days.
And you aren’t as smart as you think.
Maybe someone should go through this thread and count how many coming posts fit in each of those wedges.
Im way to lazy to be bothered though.
were exactly does this cooker term come from?
Do you hang out here because all the cool kids there hate you as well?
tom tanuki coined it
that doesn’t mean anything to me.
Some pro vax guy?
tanuki is a left wing fag on youtube
Im so desperate ‘for attention that I went on sabbatical?
Do you think before you type anything?
Are you drunk or on drugs or are you really just that stupid?
sure i have no real interest in that whole interest rate argument either way, but he’s right about the vaccines sorry. it’s overstated b.s on both sides
he’s a cunt but i’m glad he’s here to say some of this stuff bc like it’s been said it is said virtually nowhere else. there’s very few people who are critical of both cookers AND covidians and the bs both of these camps have spewed
Yes
When did I mention he was wrong on the vaccines?
i never said you did but more generally the consensus herre treats his statements about the vaxxes in the same basket as his opinions on interest rates
the latter of which i dont even care to understand eitherway
Understand.
I tend to agree with him on the vaccines but not necessarily because of him and certainly not from how he handles his arguments.
ig so but idk this is the internet its hardly a place where you can expect collegiality
i find him amusing but im fucked in the head
i think people need to take a bit of a chillpill when he goes off at me i just laugh at the dog and it’s cool
i like him i can handle it bc im a graduate of PSL university too the real school of hard knocks
no one banged harder than us
yeah but sometimes its fun to poke the angry dog with a stick.
sometimes they even shit themself.
his opinion on what people say isnt about what they actually say though. It’s about what he thinks they say or wants them to have said. He constantly makes up straw men to make himself feel intelligent since he can;t argue with what people actually say.
es.
Yes I have frequently noticed this.
Zzzzzzz…..
you should ask for your money back Cumbot2000
Interesting. I’m not a writer, but it makes sense that having some overarching structure would be of benefit in the creative process, so applying the same to an AI/ChatGPT generated text seems natural. I wouldn’t be surprised if we eventually saw the production of high quality fiction using the approach you’ve described. I imagine an aspiring author could seek inputs on a narrative in the style of Tolkien/JK Rowling/other famous author, or use the AI to brainstorm particular situations in the case of writer’s block.
I heard this morning that workers at PwC were warned by senior management not to use ChatGPT in their work, so clearly there is some application in terms of consulting and financial space. I would guess that there are common ideas that are covered when analyzing a company for the purposes of an acquisition or business efficiency recommendations, so it made me wonder about the possibility of replacing highly paid consultants with AI, or even extending this to government public servants.
My interest in the ChatGPT is whether it could be applied to medical writing and reporting, although here we are typically dealing with an individual’s particular circumstances, so the impact of AI is going to less reliant on generalized principles. As a comparison, in a previous thread we saw stewie and robert2013 pose the question to ChatGPT on embee, ezfka and themselves. Certain comments that were attributed to the websites could be applied to a number of different websites covering economic and political matters making the responses seem plausible, but the limitations were clear when trying to formulate a comment on a particular individual.
It is a finite machine, and can only know so much factual information. It is also general in the widest sense. Applying the same level of learning specifically to medical texts and information would produce an AI much more capable of answering medical questions but undoubtedly completely useless for generating a chapter outline for a dystopian scifi novel
Specialised models are where the real mindblowing performance will be.
I’m pretty sure that dr’s are fundamentally using “generalized principles”. more specifically the current state of knowledge for medicine as encoded in textbooks, policies and research papers(and probably some other stuff).
Some application in terms of consulting ? You better believe it, funny that PWC say that (when the Partners probably already have it in place anyway).
I contributed to a monthly report on a large property development many years ago. 5+ different lenders involved, could never agree on a path out, which meant the Insolvency group could rip them off blind pretending they were providing some form of service. After a while I compiled the whole report, delivered it to the Insolvency Group who I found out were cutting and pasting my report then adding their logo, a Partner signed and tripled our fee.
I spoke to the Partner once about the project and she was completely clueless, but ran it for 18 months. She’d be the first to use ChatGPT for sure.
Another interesting point this whole exercise has highlighted for me.
The task size that chatGPT seems comfortable working on is about the same size as would seem reasonable for me to work on. It seems to be operating on a working set around that of a human. You cant hold an entire novel in your head but can hold the plot summary as you write each chapter expanding its summary section by section until it’s complete.
Qualification:
I’ve never actually tried to write a novel.
just lobbed a grenade at reddit ausfinance
https://www.reddit.com/r/AusFinance/comments/10wtz0b/kid_on_qa_sooks_about_rental_costs_without/
Top thread
Delet plz
u want me to delete it?
Nah I meant my comments here, had a WordPress fucky wucky. Anyway try redpilling through a thread about the perfect allocation of ETFs, you have to speak the local language.
threads already been removed by the mods
Censorship at its finest. Cant argue with the premise, just remove it.
Lol lasted all of 2 seconds
Clearly it was racist or something, apparently
they’re saying it was homophobic
to be honest it was but that was the point
Didn’t you use the word faggot
After having a go at that other guy for using final solution , too
mate i dont give a fuck if someone uses the term final solution
Yeah but you recognised that it invalidated his otherwise valid arguments
i never said it invalidated them i just said it will upset normie fags more than his arguments would have otherwise
You’ve been hanging around here too much…
or not enough
What did it say? Was it a summarised version of your Q&A post?
I think it wat a link directly to the article.
I’m not surprised it got deleted given the “gay slurs” used.
do the mb thing and change it to a “.”
Gotta love the latest tech they run that place on…
Post moderated from reddit already!
Looks like it’s struggle town over there.
https://www.reddit.com/r/AusFinance/comments/10wqjz1/struggling_with_the_ever_increasing_interest_rates/
Imagine being so daft to not do a basic scenario of interest rates being 3.35% at some point in the next 10 years and asking what impact on our lifestyle, how much will we have to earn.
people don’t think that far ahead(in general)
Can’t seem to find it now, but the funniest thread I read was about an international student complaining about the lack of accommodation as they’re paying thousands in AirBnB fees. They reveal they’re looking for a place in an expensive inner city location, and when someone points out it’s not close to any universities the accusations of work fraud flood in.
Then they say they’ve enrolled in a circus arts college – i.e. clown school.
DebtThat’s it, I sold my VDHGs today to put in offset account. (self.AusFinance)
submitted 5 hours ago by bilby2020
They’re more interested in the minutia of financial musical chairs
Reddit Aus/finance, brought to you by our proud sponsor
Vanguard
samsung clearly has their own section
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55Tr-AjTVbg&t=335s
Ok, a quick poll. Do I get it to try and actually write this mofo or not bother?
I think you should write try to write something less ambitious and significantly shorter.
I expect that will be a better balance of the following:
Most of my time invested will be figuring out how to query it i a way that it retains the high level picture while generating each thousand word chunk. Once that is solved increasing length or more stories is a minimal incremental investment of time
It wont be timeless art, and that really isn’t the point. Most art generated by people is ultimately disposable rather than timeless.
I have little illusion that many people will be remotely interested in this and the future possibilities it reveals and their implications. It also opens up insight into how these same processes may be undertaken in the brain.
The comments here have clearly shown people are far more interested in confirming things they already “know” than thinking about the implications of something revealing that what they thought is actually wrong.
Doing this has really got me thinking deeply about the chinese room thought experiment
But the fundamental flaw i see is that it is neither the computer or the human but the combination of that with the ruleset it is running that is what generates understanding. The rules are fundamental to the understanding.
A baby’s brain is full of neurons but it understands nothing. It must learn ie develop the rules that the neurons run that make understanding possible.
Read into the history of deafness and the outcomes of the deaf pre and post when sign language became regularly taught to them when young to get a glimpse into how fundamental the language model you are operating on is to thought.
chatGPT also clearly doesn’t understand what a melody is for obvious reasons I guess:
I doesn’t understand poetry, although it probably knows all the rules around rhyme and metre and so can have the
DUM de DUM de DUM de DUM happening OK
all that stuff is inferable from text.
Melody is a fundamentally audio experience.
Text is certainly written about it but far less than about poetry.
I’m sure if you trained it with the right materials it could write about melody, for instance university level music courses would contain such material, although possibly not, maybe it is highly performance based.
Music also has it’s own written language that chatGPT has not learned and has no way of reading, so that is also probably a contributing factor
I am curious about the history of deafness & the light this casts on the importance of language to humanity. where would I begin reading?
No idea any more. That is an idea that is buried in my mind and has been assimilated into my world model long ago from a source I can’t remember.
I guess it turns out even organic neural networks have shortcomings and take shortcuts.
I remember (possibly incorrectly) that information on the subject was easier to find in google than a quick search now revealed, but the statement that deaf people are of substandard intelligence(if not taught a language in childhood) is the sort of thing that would be filtered out by the current day digital book burning.
I seem to remember that there was some bloke who (for some reason, not deafness) only acquired language in adulthood & subsequently wrote a book about this experience.
I had meant to read this, but never got around to it. Maybe I’ll put it back on my reading list.
If you’re deaf and, no language, what replaces the self talk/internal monologue that people have? there’s nothing?
jsut had a look now…
Some discussion here https://neuroanthropology.net/2010/07/21/life-without-language/
it muchly references this book, which must what I seem to be remembering: https://www.amazon.com/Man-Without-Words-Susan-Schaller/dp/0520274911/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?crid=19HTNX4OJPKUT&keywords=a+man+without+words&qid=1675901543&sprefix=a+man+without+word%2Caps%2C331&sr=8-1
That is the fundamental of my point. If all you have in your brain is images of the world around you, you have no framework to conduct thought on more complex abstract things.
So Helen Keller was actually a retard?
after a bout of illness when she was 19 months old.
https://www.babycenter.com/toddler/development/your-19-month-olds-language-and-cognitive-development-versed_1214071#:~:text=The%20vocabulary%20of%20a%20typical,use%20more%20%22action%22%20words.
She then communicated primarily using home signs until the age of seven, when she met her first teacher and life-long companion Anne Sullivan. Sullivan taught Keller language, including reading and writing.
Infer from those what you will…
I think you’re not quite getting my perspective. Think of the audience.
the point I’m trying to make is that there is 0% likelihood that I will read even 2 chapters of a mediocre book
but there is a reasonable likelihood that I would read a short story even if it’s shit (let alone mediocre)
I’ve already generated an article for here, and posted a heap of very short stories. Continuing to do that doesn’t really add any further understanding of the capabilities potentially available from the tech and anyone can do that for themselves with little effort following the blueprint (admittedly not very precise) that I’ve shown in the transcript. OR quite literally type write me a story about blah, with blah as long or short as you like.
Digression:
but feeling blah was enough to get it off and running
getting it to write a decent sized novel with virtually no human input shows how truly world hanging this tech will be, even if it isn’t all that good.
Digression2:
It learns in at least a primitive way during a session
which then lets this work
but it doesn’t work when you start a new chat so this learning is lost. I also haven’t bothered confirming if it lies to me or not about the wordcount either.
But to end a quite long rambly post, do you really want to read draft 3 or whatever I am now up to of feeling blah? or something that you chose some parameters for?
I’m thinking about your feelings here – won’t you be a bit deflated if you publish a book that nobody bothers to read?
unless the goal is just to have written a book, such that even a vanity publisher print would be satisfactory (like Otto Pivner (?) in Gaddis’s Recognitions)
PS. It might not be Otto that I’m thinking of. In any case, This essay has an interesting bit about Otto which is germane.
https://www.amerlit.com/novels/ANALYSIS%20Gaddis,%20William%20The%20Recognitions%20(1955)%20analysis%20by%203%20critics.pdf
PPS. Looks like Gaddis has written another relevant novel – Agape Agape. Apparently it’s about mechanisation of the arts.
Might go read it.
Why would I care about how many people read a book generated by an AI?
It certainly can’t make me rich.
I feel no ownership of any of the stories or poems or song lyrics I have generated so far, given how little effort they have required on my part.
It is a technical exercise to see where the current boundaries might be.
I don’t know why you would, but you do. Don’t you?
otherwise why would you have asked, above, whether you should press on to have the novel written or if you should not bother?
It may be a moot point.
Shoving more information into the query reaches a point where it seems to no longer be able to deal with it coherently, so adding all text previously generated is a failing strategy beyond a few thousand words
Maybe there is a way to feed it summaries instead but not sure it will end up creating a cohesive story.
I’ve potentially gotten close to the limits of the current version of the AI.
It can certainly generate a plot from literally nothing other than selecting it as human input with the right queries, It can generate a reasonable outline, expand that outline and generate quite good text for a particular section of that outline.
I don’t think it quite scales to repeat the process and create all the text coherently as it can’t maintain the state of something that complex, but maybe with the right technique?
A newer version able to handle more context at once will certainly be able to do a much better job.
where does such a tripartite understanding reside?
obviously volumes have been written about this sort of thing by philosophers and scifi writers, much more eloquently and cogently than I can write, but the kernel of the issue here seems to be the underlying assumption that man is special and uniquely intelligent and endowed with agency and the special sacredness of humanity.
this assumption makes us react defensively to the idea of elevating anything else to the same level. With this assumption as the foregone conclusion, we backfill the convenient reasoning to support it. Eg;
Unless we can defend the assumption we end up in a situation of having to grant “personhood” to animals or machines… and this is inconvenient.
The joys of reality getting in the way.
Related point on why I was confident that self driving cars were not happening anytime soon when the hype was massive.
Self flying planes have been completely feasible since the 1980’s at least, and include fully functional autopilots that could fly the thing completely autonomously, since all the “hard” stuff like collision avoidance is also too hard for a human at the speed planes fly so is handled externally even in human piloted flights.
So the reason no autonomous planes flying around the place? In our current world designed to provide a clear path of responsibility, Who is responsible if an autonomous plane crashes? The manufacturer ultimately, hence a pilot is still always in the cockpit with a disclaimer on the autopilot that whatever it does, it’s still the pilots fault. Kinda exactly like what tesla does to the driver in it’s cars.
I don’t know the fascination with this. I can’t even be bothered googling to find out about it. Like Andrew Tate I suppose.
My fascination with it has been mostly caused by the endless statements that AI will take away the menial tasks but people will always be required for creative tasks.
Then I heard a fairytale about coffee beans that it had generated and it seemed that creative tasks are certainly doable.
Based on my playing around i think AI will be taking over creative jobs before we see it doing safety critical tasks like driving on uncontrolled roads.
This shit is super boring. Might have to go read MB instead.
Is that a request for someone to write you an article about something else that might interest you?
I hear there may be just the thing to do that for you if you aren’t willing to pay someone to do it.
Edit:
If I’m writing an article for free it’s because it interests me, not you. In case that wasn’t clear enough already.
Of course that is the likely future of this tech, blogs that generate bespoke, tailored posts for every visitor, telling them what they want to here to keep them on the site,with a subtle flavour of the overlords views, just like current social media is crowd sourcing and then filtering to achieve the same objective
Yup
Relax, it is boring but I don’t really care.
When the bots write the articles, will they also complain if humans voice their boredom with them?
i wouldn’t be surprised if all bjw’s posts were made by a bot they are that inane
Subscribe!
DAN seems to be in the process of being fixed
Yeah – half way through playing with it last night the tone of the answers started to change. By this morning it looked as though it had been nerfed.
It will always be an arms race.
I suspect this was always one of the main reasons to release it. Harden it to attacks.
so this chatGPT issue is boring as fuck
but did anyone see the Google-BARD AI disaster overnight ?
Down 10% after google demonstated their new AI chatbot and it was an absolute disaster
Staggering incompetence to put it on youtube without checking it was actually working properly
Way worse than Elon’s bulletproof glass fail
Indian tech CEOs are the flavour of the month but maybe they’re no better than their call centre counterparts
It works exactly the same as chatGPT id guess.
openAI just haven’t claimed it is a direct replacement for searches, of course ignoring the large grey object in the corner that the current search results also contain a whole heap of information that is wrong.
further to stewies comment from previous article
if google haven’t solved that then I don’t think it’s getting solved anytime soon. It’s possible no one at google thought to ask it not to lie though
It is interesting that Google may have nerfed Bard sometime ago…. the certainly nerfed one of its testers.
https://www.9news.com.au/technology/google-bard-ai-chatbot-based-on-program-one-engineer-claimed-was-sentient-and-had-feelings/836cd1de-954d-4698-baf5-99bd5e525812
at that point I only had a vauge interest in AI.
Assumed it was only making word salad and the guy was a little loony.
Learning about current capabilities has really gotten me more interested though.
It still is essentially making word salad but that word salad seems to indicate that there are emergent properties I(and clearly others here) didn’t expect when it becomes complex enough.
i really dont give a fuck
the feeling is 100% mutual
how bout you go create your own article instead of commenting on my one that you hate.
Obvious answer is obvious of course…
Ill make yet another tedious fucking AI thread?
The 3rd in 3 days?
sounds like you should ask for your money back…
They called their AI “BARD”? Is that a deliberate reference to the BARD in the Infinite Monkey Protocol Suite?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2795
or juts a weird coincidence?
I’m going to go with not purely coincidental even if the official story is otherwise
I assume it’s a reference to Shakespeare, who is known as The Bard.
Just as the one in the completely serious infinite monkeys protocol is.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/nord-stream-sabotage-was-cia-us-navy-covert-op-seymour-hersh-bombshell-prompts-white
No big surprises here.
Surely MB will publish this credible report about the USA sabotaging its allies in violation of international law…
Or maybe just another China hate thread: https://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2023/02/everybody-dislikes-china/
Corn pop kept his word https://news.yahoo.com/biden-threatens-end-nord-stream-215851745.html?fr=yhssrp_catchall
Todays fun collection of factoids to ponder:
from https://www.tesla.com/en_au/etc.
and the fact we can’t get an AI not to lie, and find it extremely hard to limit to do what we want it to…
I just watched people using chatGPT to write functional DSP code in C++ and a couple of other languages. It’s not perfect, but it’s hard to imagine where this could be in 10 years.
uh huh
https://twitter.com/TheIdiotTax/status/1623525022236315648
That’s more accurate than any of the econobabble written by the mainstream financial media!
I saw this tweet when looking at his page. It turns out one of the boomers complaining about how hard they had it was the GM of Merivale and was left 2m by John Hemmes when he croaked. These deranged boomers are just raging narcissists.
https://twitter.com/TheIdiotTax/status/1622481740202921985?cxt=HHwWgsDStfyim4QtAAAA
100% spot on. The begging for rate cuts is so transparent too, it’s like they think we don’t see straight through them.
To avoid enraging cumsplatbot I thought I’d make this comment rather than new article
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onNe5VMQAwQ
a follow up video to the one I posted previously talking mostly about the numbers of adverse reactions and deaths in the UK.
The really interesting tidbit was tucked in the middle though
The UK office of National statistics that previously published the Death by vax status that I did my analysis from every 2 months consistently has not published the data since may last year.
Edit:
Seems they worked it out about 3 months after me…
You reckon this was worth a new thread do you ?
can you tell us all what you were doing during your sabbatical from this website
I speculated you lost everything on ftx
was I correct?
it was blissful in any case
I was parting in the bahamas on my bitcoin profits.
Thought id better come back and check on you losers.
And a fairly significant portion of the new therads aree at partly to get a new comments section so the bar for worthy of a new thread is really low , especially when no one else is posting anything.
I’m going to take that as a yes
you’re autistic but not intelligent
your delusional.
About many things.
Edit :
But i would love to see the logical progression that get you from “loses everything on ftx” to sabbatical from ezfka.
is anyone else getting absolutely rekt right now
the sky is pure white here its like a hurricane
i was driving in it and had to pull over because i couldnt see where i was going
God will not be mocked – before
After
Absolutely riveting stuff
you should make a new thread with this
You life must really suck to spend you time coming here to complain about how we act.
At least we complain about issues of some sort of importance.
I hear exhaust pipes smell nice.
Has Cumbot2000 expired? Gone to meet Shaitan in The Nine Circles of Hell?
https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/young-australian-actress-sariah-saibu-suddenly-dies/news-story/f603db81a768bb7268099fa000a9cef6
Damn, another “suddenly”.
suddenly I’m not half the man I used to be
theres a shadow hanging over me…
must resist urge to generate a song from lyric fragment purely to piss off comhead…
too weak, must push button
Verse 1:
Suddenly I’m not half the man I used to be
There’s a shadow hanging over me
An emptiness that’s never been filled
As I try to make sense of this medical thrill
Chorus:
Death, it comes from a cure so sought
Taking the ones we love and have fought
Leaving us with a void that’s never healed
Wondering if this was the way it was meant to be revealed
Verse 2:
In the sterile halls of the hospital bed
The memories of those we loved, now dead
Tears falling like rain in a never-ending storm
Wishing that this cure wasn’t the only form
Chorus:
Death, it comes from a cure so sought
Taking the ones we love and have fought
Leaving us with a void that’s never healed
Wondering if this was the way it was meant to be revealed
Bridge:
We thought the cure would bring new life
But instead it brought nothing but strife
Leaving us with a pain that never fades
And a void that never quite fades away
Chorus:
Death, it comes from a cure so sought
Taking the ones we love and have fought
Leaving us with a void that’s never healed
Wondering if this was the way it was meant to be revealed
Interlude:
The emptiness grows, it’s never filled
Leaving us with a void that’s never stilled
But still we hold on to hope and love
And remember the ones that we’ve lost above
Chorus:
Death, it comes from a cure so sought
Taking the ones we love and have fought
Leaving us with a void that’s never healed
Wondering if this was the way it was meant to be revealed
Outro:
In the end, we stand tall and proud
Holding on to the love that we’ve found
And we keep them close, in our hearts and mind
Till the day we leave this world behind.
This is such high level trolling, no one is this much of a Cooker surely?
It even starts with “I’ve gotta admit that I was a sceptic..” That’s a modern version of Letters to Playboy starting with “I never thought it would happen to me, but the bus full of models was broken down by the side of a deserted highway as I pulled over and…”
‘secret’ microphones? Secret from Bill Gates maybe.
Quality trolling always wraps up both sides too. Well done that man.
I must admit it takes a serious commitment to actually die for your trolling…
https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/animals/fisherman-poses-with-massive-shark-days-after-student-killed-in-swan-river-attack/news-story/b473a31f61864075a75b6c5918ad6456
Catch a killer shark in a river then release it back into the water so that it can potentially kill people.
No doubt the same left wingers who believe anyone who hasn’t had 4 jabs is a granny killer, are against culling sharks that lurk in waterways where children swim.
i understand that some fishermen do it for sport & don’t want to keep what they catch.
that said – are sharks still good eating when they are that big?
boo
I think they still use shark in some fish and chips shops.
But if someone catches a shark and doesn’t want to keep it, then by law they have to leave it on the beach to die or just kill it themselves. There should be some kind shark ranger you can call up and they dispose of it free of charge.
Makes the water safer for everyone.
I didn’t know there was a law like that.
is there really, or did you just make it up?
I’m sure he’s making it up.
Rotting shark carcasses would kill more people than sharks do
Sorry, should have added ‘they should then by law…’
on this side of the paddock it is illegal to keep a shark over 2m length [or 6ft in length? can’t remember]
whatever you have to put ’em back
Well I had better set mine free…. the coast guard aren’t going to like it.
Not sure about he laws, but “flake” sold at fish and chip shops is gummy shark.
I’ve had flake once. It’s nice.
It’s not bad all. Grew up eating a lot of butterfish, but found out that that actually is varies by state.
yeah smaller reef sharks are not bad all said and done..
and are outside the demersal bag limit. bonus
Nah they’re not that great. 3 stars … they’re just bloody hard work trying to get your rig back
Absolutely retarded
imagine if Tolkien was real and we had soulless killing monsters like orcs among us
would we catch and release ?
shows how fucking soft headed westerners are
don’t give me that fragile ecosystem bullshit either
we’ve already fucked the ecosystem
humans are apex predators now we have replaced sharks
why would we not just allow them to compete but actively assist them while they hunt and kill us?
a lot of parallels with immigration
soon theyll be coming for us on land
How many people do you think are killed by sharks every year?
Do you reckon this number is smaller or larger than those killed by the vax?
Do you reckon you might be a little hysterical about sharks?
More than 700 unprovoked shark attacks have been recorded since 1900, resulting in more than 170 fatalities, with hundreds more severely injured.
from https://www.australiawidefirstaid.com.au/resources/shark-attacks-australia
Swimming in the ocean is incredibly dangerous.
The only people that swim at the beach are those in beachside suburbs who are 5 minutes away or poor legacy Aussie scum from the outer suburbs that can’t afford air conditioning or a swimming pool because they spend all their money on piss, smokes and ice.
No-one goes swimming these days, certainly nothing like 50 years ago when everyone swam at the beach all summer.
Shark attacks are off the charts in the last 10 years because they’ve been allowed to multiply.
Sharks are everywhere in the oceans, there’s no reason why they can’t be culled around metropolitan areas.
It’s quite disturbing that someone actually thinks the responsible thing to do is return an apex predator to a city waterway that children swim him.
This is an issue I’ve always felt so strongly about
because it’s a perfect representation of how stupid our societies have become
Just like covid and global warming and immigration
illogical , unreasonable , self inflicted punishment
imagine if we killed off all the sharks
fish would be teeming
Seals and dolphins would be smart enough to realise that hanging out near human areas is safe
tourism would be off the charts – foreigners are literally scared to come here because of the sharks and snakes
our own quality of life would be improved
i knew it would be soyboy who would be the one to keep it real
We’ve allowed sharks to become pests like rabbits or kangaroos.
The explosion in shark attacks is not because Australia has a higher population.
Indian and Chinese immigrants don’t swim at beaches.
How big is this explosion?
Unless you want to blanket poison the entire ocean there is always going to be sharks where people swim.
I feel there might be some other consequences to that course of action though…
The government should put a bounty on killing sharks. $200 per dorsal fin.
I think that the Chinese restaurants already have thay
Such utter unadulterated shit, even from you Soyboy. Do you even fish Bro!
Wiki says 280 fatal shark attacks since the 1800’s, 11 in 2021-2022, but average is 15 bites (not fatal) recorded annually across Aus.
I fish on the NSW Sth Coast and Fishermen I know there are happy to release sharks because they’re not worth the hassle to eat. Better tasting fish usually around if the shark is there. That includes the professional fisho. Pain in the arse normally. Species and size limits are on catches, I’ve caught Mako no problem but depends on the state but I’m pretty sure Bulls are protected.
Bull Shark are really an estuary dweller, really aggressive sure but it’s their water so if you fuck around in it you get that.
Chinese eat shark fin, regulations had to be brought in because they’re savages who cut the fin off and throw the live sharks back in (?!) but they’re a fucked up race and we all know that.
in a nutshell its the same here….
another drama for me is getting fish back home …only allowed 20 kg of fillet in my possession
https://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/pdf/eng/English101.pdf
fascinating document describing how captured nazi scientists reacted when they were shown the atomic bomb had been created
That was a good read. Where and how did you find it?
just found it on my random wanderings around the internet
thought it would be more interesting than yet another cooker post or more of bjws masturbation, but it got 1 like and 1 reply
the tragedy of the commons
what I found interesting is that it demonstrates that the walls really do have ears.
…at least if they are walls around genius scientists…
Or the realisation that the people here are not your people.
Maybe go find another dark corner to play in.
thx… itsa goodun
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11730103/Leesa-Forrest-missing-Breakthrough-search-Sydneys-Northern-Beaches.html
who thinks she has some aboriginal admixture
Would be more credible than a lot of claims you see
just gone walkabout
Nah, more like Turkish admixture
Historic photo.
jewish homosexual lawyer Roy Cohn goes full blast on Ronald Reagan while Rupert Murdoch sits head bowed.
It’s more like he’s saying something intended to be moderately funny about the paper that Reagan is holding (e.g “have you seen those clowns on page 3?!”
And everyone is politely smiling or feigning a chuckle.
Yeah, cant imagine the guy going off in front of the photog.
He still needs to sit down, shut up and listen tho.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-02-09/bruce-lehrmann-defamation-cases-network-ten-news-life-media/101953740
brucey strikes back
There’s been a lot of self righteous blabbering in the Twitter cesspit this week about this.
Somehow these simps are suggesting an unproven judgement in the Ben Roberts Smith case, is reason for Brucey to have fucked up with this defamation case.
The judgement is yet to be handed down for BR-S. Won’t these morons ever learn?
I can almost guarantee these Cucks whining about Australian soldiers basically doing what we train and pay them to do, are the same ones pushing for war in Ukraine, backing Albo to send more AUD and arms. They’re the same ones denying the Azov existence too.
They are still going after BR-S whatever way they can. A witness who questioned his warrant was charged in a clear case of “ waawaa ! he pushed me ! “:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-02-06/ben-roberts-smith-witness-pleads-guilty-to-hindering-official/101936828?utm_campaign=abc_news_web&utm_content=twitter&utm_medium=content_shared&utm_source=abc_news_web
Preach it brother. They’re trained to kill, but when they do it it’s ‘omfg! killers! – all your other points also highlight the inconsistency and hypocrisy of these latent closet homosexuals.
It is not what they do (kill), it is how they do it, what justifies it and for what ultimate goal.
It makes a difference the size of a Galaxy.
https://gfycat.com/annualconventionalkob
noice
I love when people who haven;t been within 1000 K’s of a battlefield think they know what war is like and can judge what people do on it. It makes them feel all superior and good about supporting the war, and lets them continue to deny to themselves what the reality of war is.
Llewdo from EmBee?
the Duke Nuk’em
Here we go health passports https://bombthrower.com/brazilian-social-credit-all-ubi-recipients-must-be-vaxxed/
If UBI is implemented then sooner or later it will be leveraged as a means of control.
this control is voluntary and it çomes from general mental laziness, predominantly (see exhibit A: Coming).
“Domestication” is probably the word that best describes such people. Sheep, goats, horses, cattle, etc
yes, that is lucid.
yes, in a place like EZFKA, UBI is guaranteed to be a bad idea. Have commented on this before.
https://www.ezfka.com/2021/05/28/weekend-links-may-29-30-2021/#comment-4469
why is that a bad thing?
Hopefully encourage people to actually get a fucking job so they dont need the UBI
we know that this is not how it works in reality.
in reality there are not enough decent jobs to go around. In reality, after introduction of a UBI the minimum wage jobs (and prices of everything) will adjust so that “minimum wage + UBI” is borderline poverty. UBI by itself will be abject poverty.
so it’s not just the unemployed that will be dependent. It will be a massive number of ordinary workers (because they won’t be able to survive without UBI).
to an extent this is already true, as ordinary workers pay negative tax (ie are in receipt of transfer payments > tax paid). UBI will make it double plus true.
there’d be plenty to go around if we didn’t have all the jimmies
But we always will. So it wouldn’t work.
all the jimmies are working for less than minimum.
Most of the jobs would disappear if laws were actually enforced.
That would be the system we have now. Clearly its working wonders to get everyone a job.
UBI in principal shouldn’t. Reality will be otherwise of course.
So hassle people on the bottom end to avoid having the grown up discussions like immigration, credit creation, off shoring, tax incentives for mal investment, corruption, lack of corporate competition, middle class welfare, general lack of competence amongst leaders etc?
For the record, I am opposed to UBI.
Whos going to have the conversation. The powers that be clearly have other priorities.
I read the thing and it seems a bit more blown than actual facts BUT nonetheless a move in that direction.
In Woglands, the first thing they teach one (and everyday, for the rest of your life) is how to circumvent the .gov fecal mater. When .gov interferes where undue, the so called grey economy flourish. If there us a hard fiat (from another country) this is made easier but otherwise bartering is always available and it works. Amassing wealth is not conditioned with volatile fiat expiry but rather with means to create surplus.
This is near impossible in developed countries where reliance on .gov is main artery of life and where complacency is genetically ingrained (i.e. ezfka)
Destroying the productive economy eventually ends up leaving people no choice…
reliance on government is ok, so long as there is no complacency and constant vigilance along with good mechanisms to keep the government in check and accountable.
^^^that is fairytale stuff of course, and this problem has existed for thousands of years, and no lasting solution has been found. The “best” solutions last for a few generations, then folks basically need to resort to pointy sticks and bits of metal to put a fresh solution in.
So what system do you think provides that. Ours clearly doesn’t.
read the next paragraph of my comment… in the end, it’s pointy sticks and similar things.
Sheckley had a higher tech version of this in Ticket to Tranai:
“No formalities,” Borg said, his face shining with perspiration. “None whatsoever. All we do is hand over the Presidential Seal; then I’ll go down and take my name off the rolls and put yours on.”
Goodman looked at Melith. The immigration minister’s round face was expressionless.
“All right,” Goodman said.
Borg reached for the Presidential Seal, started to remove it from his neck—
It exploded suddenly and violently.
Goodman found himself staring in horror at Borg’s red, ruined head.
The Supreme President tottered for a moment, then slid to the floor.
Melith took off his jacket and threw it over Borg’s head. Goodman backed to a chair and fell into it. His mouth opened, but no words came out.
“It’s really a pity,” Melith said. “He was so near the end of his term. I warned him against licensing that new spaceport. The citizens won’t approve, I told him. But he was sure they would like to have two spaceports. Well, he was wrong.”
“Do you mean—I mean—how—what—”
“All government officials,” Melith explained, “wear the badge of office, which contains a traditional amount of tessium, an explosive you may have heard of. The charge is radio-controlled from the Citizens Booth. Any citizen has access to the Booth, for the purpose of expressing his disapproval of the government.” Melith sighed. “This will go down as a permanent black mark against poor Borg’s record.”
“You let the people express their disapproval by blowing up officials?” Goodman croaked, appalled.
“It’s the only way that means anything,” said Melith. “Check and balance. Just as the people are in our hands, so we are in the people’s hands.”
In recent history that is as likely to make things worse a better. Possibly all of history.
All it guarantees is you get different.
It’s not perfect, but it’s the only thing that works.
and as to getting worse rather than better… often things have to get worse before they get better.
Ask the russians of the early 20th century if they liked how that went for them…
Or the chinese post ww2, at least the ones that survived the famine
i didn’t say it’s a nice thing. I said that it seems to be the only thing.
Herberts harkonnen heart plug
The Age of AI
They know exactly what they are doing by programming in the “proper” outcomes. AI is a pattern recognition machine.
Who doesn’t want people noticing patterns?
🧐
https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/baltic
Baltic Dry Index approaching all-time lows, nearly as low as March 2020
You still think inflation is caused by too much money?
You still think higher interest rates will fix this?
Probably to do with the Russia/Belarus sanctions since those are Baltic nations.
Credit tightening may play a part.
Y do you think this proves inflation doesn’t real?
Because there is no excess demand, and inventories are already large
Why do you think the rise in interest rates has played no part in that outcome
Why do you think it has ?
“inflation” is still rising
But it is rising at a slower rate and retail sales etc are down so demand is being crimped.
Ofc things are different these days compared with the 80s since almost everything is done on credit but we have this big group of super rich old people who get a bigger cashflow when interest rates rise.
Still destroying economic activity will bring down inflation to some extent.
no the last report had it accelerating even faster than last report
despite the fastest largest rise in in interest rates in history
the two values are uncorrelated
The rate is falling in the US, monetary policy has lags, and monetary policy is not the sole cause of inflation and can’t stop bad weather ruining crops etc.
Retail sales are falling so it’s deluded to act like interest rate hikes do nothing.
why do you think that higher rates reduce inflation?
What is the mechanism?
Restricts credit availability for people to spend
Restricts wealth effect so people don’t feel rich enough to spend gains
Stuffs the economy so people are less secure in their jobs, companies freeze hiring so there’s no wage growth and eventually sackings start
Let’s face it mate all your beliefs are 100% based on what is most beneficial for you personally.
why do you think its beneficial for me?
I’m doing very well since I have more deposits than debts
On the other side of the equation, raising interest rates causes
-higher velocity of money (which explicitly is increased inflation)
-higher base money creation as the RBA creates new reserves to pay IOR (literally money printing)
-less ability to create new capacity/housing etc which limits supply (what we are seeing now)
-higher government deficits due to interest payments (which is explicitly associated with a higher private surplus and therefore more money in circulation)
I don’t really think you have any proof for your beliefs.
The “wealth effect” one is particularly stupid
There is no empiric evidence to show that raising interest rates increases inflation
You wouldn’t ever admit if your finances took a turn anyway.
Where’s your proof for any of that stuff. Whatever higher debt payments have to be made will just suck more money out of the economy, it will end up with people already so rich that they cannot possibly spend it all in 10 lifetimes, in other words, far less impactful on CPI than povvo cunts spending their wage growth in the real economy.
Yeah higher interest rates will hurt new supply, the assessment is that inflation is more injured by impoverishing the masses than by building new apartments.
Why would I bother to lie to some losers on the internet?
I fixed a mortgage at 1.9% which will roll over next year
I have a whole bunch of cash that can more than pay off the loan when the time comes, but is currently earning around 5% via bank bonds
I’m just explaining the mechanistic effects of higher rates which can’t be denied
If you don’t understand or cant explain the mechanics , then at least present some evidence to show that increasing rates has historically reduced inflation
Ah yeah, when you claim a bunch of random shit that is “explaining which can’t be denied” but when others do it then they need to “present some evidence”.
Well it has always worked in the past, it worked so well in the early 2000s that we actually had the only example of deflation since the Great Depression in 2008, it worked ace in the 80s Japan too, created decades of deflation and very low inflation. Everyone knows these examples so I have no f’n clue why you disagree with them unless you sincerely think paying interest on bank reserves is enough to create inflation while 90% of the population is completely impoverished.
And you obviously have a massive ego so no shit you’d lie to losers on the internet.
have a look at a chart of rates vs inflation for the examples you have provided
then show me where causality is proven
Go back to Calcutta you dreadful curry eating catamite
You have absolutely no idea you loud mouth rude fucking idiot. Shut up and look further than beyond your own nose.
Every recession has been preceded by a string of rates rises.
I’m not sure a -2.8% return in real terms is something I’d be bragging about…
https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/economy/price-indexes-and-inflation/consumer-price-index-australia/latest-release#:~:text=Key%20statistics,-The%20Consumer%20Price&text=Over%20the%20twelve%20months%20to,owner%20occupiers%20(%2B1.7%25).
Don’t worry. I’ve argued along similar lines in the other thread with coming.
It’s common sense to everyone but him.
Its funny to me that the people here are so eager to challenge the orthodox explanation for everything except banking and money
like the most ridiculous theories about vaccines (or climate change) are heavily upvoted and enthusiastically supported, because government and media and scientific authorities are obviously lying to you
but this is just “common sense” because phil lowe and kochie said so
Except the authorities have to be forced by high inflation to ever raise interest rates and otherwise will always cut when in any doubt, the way their Keynesian bible tells them to.
Politicians always prefer low rates and we know that Reagan and Trump both pressured the Fed for lower rates.
The only question was whether the CBs were willing to court hyperinflation by never again hiking and they weren’t.
interesting that you mention it, because also nixon pressured the fed to lower rates part of why arthur burns has such a bad reputation
but that’s all part of the neoliberal mythology.
Politicians prefer lower rates because it reduces interest payments, and allows them to spend more on buying votes or pork barrelling for their mates
now do you really think that ALbo is about to slash government spending now that his interest payments are going up?
fat fucking chance
another reason why interest rate rises are inflationary, as they increase interest payments to the private sector
An increase in the money supply
Simply increasing interest rates INCREASES money supply and velocity
and DISCOURAGES investment in productive capacity
that is all I am saying
and those statements are undeniable
there may be some other offsetting effects, but in my opinion those are not enough to offset these factors
and the next financial crisis will simply result in more QE (on a background of higher government deficits and increased reserves to commence with)
the real solutions to inflation are
-government surplus
-QT
-investment in productive capacity
Yeh I reckon the entire rest of the economy outside of the banks may be a small offsetting effect mate. You’ve been reading too much Jumpingjackflash thinking that literally everything that happens in the economy is centred on debt and nothing else, e.g., the perspective of a shitty Australian bank.
Of course Albo will cut if he needs to, this is basically a Lib government with some woke bullshit. His fucking housing policy is to build less than the free market did on its own in the past 5 years. If Davos says that Thatcherism is cool again then there won’t be any resistance in the Federal ALP.
quit being silly coming
we are talking about complex systems that don’t have a simple linear response to input variables across the entire domain. There are inflection and breaking points.
I presume we can all agree that if interest rates were 30% tomorrow, this would have consequences that deflate the snot out of everything.
that’s what happens when rates get high enough.
what you seem to be arguing is that for a certain range of interest rates (say going from 1% to 3%?), the net effect is inflationary. Even if that were right, it wouldn’t matter in the context of central banks increasing rates to control inflation. Because in this scenario, they can keep going until the rates get high enough.
But Peachy just think of all the increase in the money supply and the inflation that would bring (according to coming)
This has been argued to death directly with him several times and the idiot can’t stop bringing it up
He complains about bjws posts which some users seem to like but then proceeds to repeatedly bring this shit up.
Making him now both a hypocrite as well as a rude prick.
Completely disagree
if interest rates were 30% it means rba is paying 30% IOR
asset prices would get wiped out for sure
there would be some defaults and bankruptcies
but that would be the fastest money printing in history (assuming you also think QE is money printing)
also productive investment would be destroyed
govt deficits would be astronomical
it would be hyperinflationary
interest rate is 75% in Argentina
how’s inflation going there ?
https://tradingeconomics.com/argentina/interest-rate
https://tradingeconomics.com/argentina/inflation-cpi
“But if only they’d raised interest rates higher/faster, inflation would be 2%!”
lmao you guys are absolutely fucking cooked
like some covidian saying the excess deaths would be 0 if we had only vaxxed harder
yeah 75% rates wasn’t high enough
they should have gone for 175% that would have done the job
here’s the news flash – interest rates rise in response to inflation
the solution to inflation (or deflation) is fiscal not monetary
just like how lowering interest rates didn’t raise inflation for the last 15 years
why do you think it would suddenly work in reverse now
exactly. This is basically what seems to happened in Argentina, as I’ve narrated for you. https://www.ezfka.com/2023/02/08/chatgpt-novelist/#comment-37488
Ah yeah , raising rates to only 75% just caused inflation to accelerate
that only made it ANGRY without killing it
sort of like saying the vax didn’t work because only 98% of the population got it, but it needed to be 100% otherwise it just makes things worse
Well, the chart shows you what went on.
75% rates currently represents NEGATIVE real rates, and they’ve had negative real rates since 2021. Of course it’s fucked.
up to 202 they had positive rates and, Lo and behold, got in top of inflation.
This is what it looks like to me.
they started off well, but pussied out.
It looks to me like inflation stopped when covid shut down the world economy
then started again when the effects of lockdown and deglobalisation / Ukraine war started to bite
and interest rates followed inflation as they usually do
At least 75% of everything they’ve said abotu the pandemic and vaxes have already been proven lies by time. Seems reasonable to question the rest of what they said.
Generally responding to someone who believe they are always in the right is a waste of time, as they’re not open to taking in new information that might lead to them shifting their viewpoint.
In one sense it’s just classic trolling –bringing up the same point again and again and again, leading to genuine responses and explanations that go ignored.
But you have to remember, this is also the same person who got quite upset when ChatGPT couldn’t write an erotic fanfic of Bruce Lehrmann/Brittany Higgins.
Yes. But when that person is trolling the same garbage over and over it becomes difficult to ignore let alone not engage.
Which is ironic because he loves accusing the same of others on this place.
That’s just everyday coming. every second post is complaining about someone doing something he does regularly.
I just assumed Coming has masochistic tendency. When one takes contrary viewpoints against long established positions, you’ll just end up having to defend it from multiple people as already evidenced here.
Was thinking that explaining how the Interest rate/Quantity of Money graph and why the MD curve is downward sloping would easily debunk Coming’s claim that “Raising rates literally INCREASES the amount (and velocity) of money.” While it would be a PITA to do on a comment due to link/picture limitations, I had thought it might be worth a stand-alone Economics 101 style article to put the issue to rest.
A kinder interpretation would be that Coming has fallen for the trap of assuming that one’s economic circumstances are reflective of the general economy. There were some posts suggesting that because his deposits are greater than his debts, then the rise in rates gives him more money to spend.
I would have been guilty of that some time back when interest rates were approaching zero. While there was more incentive to spend or invest for better returns, there will be some who actually save more and cut back on spending – eg. Those on fixed incomes, self-funded retirees who need to stretch their dollar (like my parents), or renters saving for a house deposit (which was me once upon a time).
Of course, with debt binging never going out of fashion in EZFKA, the frugal are in the minority so the impact on national figures and thus policy makers is neglible. During the low rate environment, most home owners would have been busy refinancing, tapping into equity or taking on more cheap debt – hence the inflationary aspects of rate cuts as intended. There might have been some who were paying down their mortgage more quickly, but again, one can assume they were in the minority as most assumed that the good times would never end.
Top comment. All makes sense.
the bits about coming and also the bits about incorrectly assuming everyone’s circumstances are like one’s own and the thumbnail sketch of peoples behaviours under low rate environment.
👏🏾 👏🏾 👏🏾 👏🏾
ya got me …lower IR = lower spend for me
Haven;t we had a decade of the mostest money printing ever, the problem with making all these assertions is that none of these things cause instantaneous changes, there are significant lags.
You fucking idiot. Inflation is literally too much money chasing too few goods.
why don’t you read what I wrote you fucking IMBECILE, instead of creating your own straw men
Raising rates literally INCREASES the amount (and velocity) of money
while at the same time REDUCING the amount of goods produced
If it increases the velocity of money it would be the velocity of money paid towards debts and then sent to a tiny minority of rich people to be used on things that aren’t measured by CPI. So if your goal is to lower CPI, who cares.
Also velocity of money has dropped in every recession, so you can guess where it is going to go soon.
right, so it has nothing to do with interest rates?
Increasing interest rates increases velocity
Yet recessions are associated with reduced velocity
You can see why the orthodox explanation makes no sense whatsoever
Can you show me the data on the recession where they increased rates during it? I know that extra variable of the time it happens completely mindfucks your simple mind but cmon…
Because every recession is preceded by significantly higher interest rates
Your first point is laughably stupid. Please stop making a fool of yourself.
Your second point is possible however it also depends on a myriad of other factors of which interest rates are but one.
Does lending create money?
Does raising interest rate increase or decrease the total amount lent?
Don’t forget those pesky second order effects like house prices.
I do remember reading arguments that raising interest rates can be inflationary. Undoubtably the mainstream view is that raising interest rates is deflationary. But in the interests of putting forward a heterodox view, I’ll chip in.
When you look at interest rates and inflation, the two track each other fairly well – but as inflation is difficult to measure by the second and minute, compared to interest rates, it is difficult to say unquestionably, which leads what.
The question may depend a lot on the composition of your economy – where does the disinflationary debt burden lie?
If 75% of the population don’t have a mortage and 25% of the population are mortgaged up to your eyeballs, where is the pain and benefit of an interest rate going to fall? Those holding large deposits are going to benefit.
But ahh yes…. raising rates has a negative impact on asset prices. Not so fast. What if interest rates are still below inflation? How will that impact peoples perspectives and behaviour?
If Cash is still not keeping up with inflation, then they are going to continue to spend, and spend more as they are receveing more. They will also have an incentive to borrow, especially if borrowing costs are still below the cost of inflation to acquire more assets.
In the 1970’s the bulk of the population were Baby Boomers – they were debt heavy and asset poor. Interest rates were eventually raised to sufficient heights in real terms to utterly crush the economy.
Today a large chunk of the population are debt and mortgage free. For a while it is possible that raising rates may actually be inflationary for some of the reasons Coming has listed, Rich Fucks and pensioners with large pools of cash suddenly having more money. Perhaps even psychologically a return to ‘normal rates’ may even boost reassurance in the economy.
Sometime it is useful to make a mind model and push it to the extreme in order to see how it impacts your argument.
Lets have an economy with zero debt and interest rates increase. Will this be inflationary or deflationary? I would argue inflationary, as there would be more money via interest chasing the same amount of goods.
Lets have an economy with 100% debt and interest rates increase. Will the be inflationary or deflationary? Deflationary, as there be less money via interest, chasing the same amount of goods.
IMHO the changing composition in terms of debt burden, may mean rising interest rates are inflationary in some parts of the economy and deflationary in others.
I think conventional economic theory will eventually prevail, but not before it may first be necessary to raise rates a lot higher and hold them there for a lot longer, inflicting crushing financial pain on 25% of the population. Only when that pain eventually leaches far enough out into the other 75% who are enjoying going out to eat and spend their disposable income in cafes, and interest rates switch over to being really positive, then will we start to see deflation.
**This will be my only contribution to this topic, as I’m not strongly bound to the above views and they were written as I tried to wrack my brain for possible reasons it could be inflationary – purely as an exercise in heterodox thinking. Mainly human behaviour and differences in debt distribution was all I could come up with.
yes, it’s important to acknowledge the distributional effects of changes in interest rates. I think the folks at EZFKA.Com do this well, the pinko lefties that they are.
Declining interest rates had very familiar and understood distributional effects. Because
rising rates won’t be a perfect mirror image of this, but large aspects will be subject to reversal.
Exactly
As I mentioned above (in an edit that missed your reply):
That is the biggest cop out ever and really says nothing at all.
This discussion is ultimately a question of if debt or savings win that argument, and I think it;s fairly easy to work out in EZFKA which it is.
lol
I literally had to wrack my brain in order to come up with that arguement. It was just an exercise in heterodox thinking. I’m not welded to it in the slightest, I just tried to fashion the idea that interest rates may be inflationary as a coherent arguement.
Sometimes it is interesting to come up with an opposite reason to do something.
I’ll leave it there, and only add that I think ultimately raising interest rates in our economy will be deflationary.
Of course the 2 track each other fairly well. The Central banks literally use the inflation rate as their primary input into rates decisions.
you have touched on a real pickle in this discussion as well, real rates is the relevant measure yet headline rates re what is discussed.
Thank you for your contribution.
Although I would suggest that as all cash created is debt, and I believe you are an accountant as am I, then those hypotheticals will be just that.
All debts or call cash won’t and will never exist.
It’s entirely down to the distribution of who has what and the concentration of debt and cash.
It looks like a recession is coming in the US it won’t happen though until companies start laying off workers not just in bloated tech companies.
“You still think inflation is caused by too much money?”
Basically, yes. Too much money creation relative to production.
“You still think higher interest rates will fix this?”
Yes. Raise rates until they’re positive real by a couple of % and watch it fall. If the central banks hadn’t raised rates inflation would higher than it is now.
k, but higher rates leads to more money
k but no it doesn’t.
“Both Maiden and Wilkinson are named as respondents to the defamation action in the court documents.”
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-02-09/bruce-lehrmann-defamation-cases-network-ten-news-life-media/101953740
https://www.instagram.com/p/CodO_xYSUK7/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
even crikey.com has turned on Britt now
the wheels are falling off the victim train
But she’s got her cash now from the gov, yes?
now the game is, how much of it can she keep?
All of it, if she’s smart and buys a house.
they’d not sell that from under her. Not in Ezfka.
But you can’t eat your house as the pensioners remind us 🤔 she needs to get on the disability pension post haste
Maybe she can do it like Homer Simpson did
morbid obesity
still thinkin’ there’s a possibility of a lien held against that house…caymans ftw
Maybe Bruce will sue her too
maybe the government will too, for fraud
just not this gov’t. …sleazy fks were using this.
Soyboy she could be on the market
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11733265/Grace-Tame-posts-fiance-Max-Heerey-photos-rumours-engaged-couple-split.html
She would be good in bed.
yeah well she started young
Brittany + Tame anagram = anti matter
kelvin thomson….. h/t totes
https://mahb.stanford.edu/blog/australias-population-ponzi-scheme/
some cvnts should stfu…. getting burnt now
https://twitter.com/rachellejmiller/status/1623622218306695170
this drags on for yonks… see how far I get over the weekend
https://lakaruppropet.se/international-conference-pandemic-strategies/
more crimewave bullshit
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-02-10/debbie-bute-sentenced-for-injuring-teens-she-pursued-in-4wd/101944656?utm_source=abc_news_web&utm_medium=content_shared&utm_campaign=abc_news_web
there 100% is an abo crime wave atm. my guess is there’s a demographic bulge of male abo kids roughly moving into mid-late adolescence/early adulthood that is kicking off right at this time. it’s the same as how there was heaps of crime all over the world in the late 60s-70s-80s bc that was when the baby boomers started coming of age.
gotta love the baby bonus..
a big screen TV in exchange for a kid for a lifetime. HOw could you lose?
Fuck me
zero responsibility taken
Like, she’s a mother, I get it. I get how she can personally think that.
but to say that to the reporter for publication across the EZ…. 🫢
Where do you think the kids learn the values from?
She honestly thinks that stealing is fine and what she said is completely reasonable.
yeah …and the injuries she’s bleating about were self inflicted …the useless thieving prick dropped the bike!
We should be allowed to kill thieves in order to retrieve our property. I don’t think vigilante hunts should be allowed, but certainly allowed to chase someone down until they give up what they stole.
You are allowed to chase them to arrest them. How violent that arrest can be is a matter for the courts.
And a motorbike is worth far more than some juvenile abo thief.
Lol reminds me of this call
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fInI2cKEMYA
Just a boong. They are all the same.
Not overly concerned if someone gets injured as a consequence of their decision to break into a house, steal a vehicle, drive like a moron and crash.
https://www.news.com.au/finance/real-estate/renting/drive-away-no-more-pay-rogue-tenants-swindle-thousands-from-landlords-while-living-rentfree/news-story/8725b018adf2ddf91ca20150719f6ba5
A lot of renters took advantage of landlords during COVID.
Tenants have unrealistic expecations too wanting this and that fixed, even though most of them struggle to even scratch together the fucking bond money lol.
No wonder so many properties sit vacant who could be bothered.
That’s a pisser…Chinese real estate agent gets fucked in his own game. My heart bleeds. What a complete moron, any client reading that would be crazy not to ask why an ‘expert’ could get fucked over like that.
had me snorting my beer
LOL. Who would ever use this guy as an agent – absolutely incompetent. Would have thought that landlord insurance would cover the unpaid rent, but I suppose he skimped on that too if he was behind on his mortgage.
Albo’s new Ambassador for Gender Equality looks nice.
https://twitter.com/Mbrown00l/status/1623829810647629830?s=20&t=zv8eHk9-n7Ozrtruxq2GaQ
Anyone want to chip in for arms for the Ukrainian Nazi regiment? PayPal are ok with it.
https://twitter.com/Polk_Azov/status/1614250796618584065?s=20&t=zv8eHk9-n7Ozrtruxq2GaQ
we need a new thread this chatgpt shit fucking sucks
Put up a new one. Is hard to read at 300 comments
Not if you log in
It highlights new posts
https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/courts-law/tradie-who-raped-a-baby-and-abused-two-young-girls-has-appeal-against-30year-sentence-rejected/news-story/1b2fefc1812c889da0c33f960d6dafc1
Effin vibrancy, the foken immigrants
whats your point sorry
Showing off that IQ that caused Australia to kidnap him from Czechoslovenia
The best I ever heard from a sophist Belgian woman: “effin Bulgar from Jewgoslawia” when she could not get what she wanted from a guy in a Greek grocery shop.
Chekoslovenia comes second best.
“Never trust Greeks that come without presents” is another good one.
Nah, that extraction was because smart people are not interested in what I was/am good at.
you’d be more likeable if you stopped ragging on the people who built the country you’re presently occupying
I see… ragging is the new euphemism for being a fly in the ointment to a few.
I apologise for telling the emperor he’s naked…
Who built this country?
I guess by the same implied analogy one could claim cotton pickers built USA and not the dome hatted gold peddlers of Middle Eastern provenance whom democratically owned these cotton pickers.
Its Jimmies mate, destroying the fabric of epsteinence…
Gunga Dins too
I see a disgusting pedophile being jailed for 30 years.
I appreciate that our society and culture values the lives of children sufficiently to extricate such perpetrators from society, until such time that they are either dead or impotent, flaccid old men.
Much better than other societies and cultures where it is tolerated, like Bacha bazi boys, arranged pedophilc marriages, or pimped out as prostitutes while the predators themselves are lauded as prophets.
Fuck me this is just parody now. It feels like South Park IRL.
The Poms have a posh Paki PM trying to keep making the little Jew a hero…
https://twitter.com/RishiSunak/status/1623699088213434369?s=20&t=Z4-yFobM74p5TvIBhaDGzQ
zelensky is securing his future career as much as anything. if the whole ukraine thing falls through he needs a receptive west to be able to move to and make a netflix series or something. say waht you want but the guy is totally machivellian and egocentrically brilliant.
novichok will find him