September 20, 2022
So, I just watched Putin’s speech live on France 24. Probably not the exact translation, as they were doing it live, and in this case some nuances might be lost, but the gist was nevertheless clear. Here are my reflections on what was said.
First of all, the speech was not aimed at the world, but was for the internal audience. Sure, a number of pundits will pick it apart and find “controversial” statements, but this is to be expected. I’ll lay out what I picked up in bullet points. The bullet points are in no particular order.
- Russia has gained four new territories (signing ceremony was held immediately after the speech. Of course, parts of the two out of four territories are under Ukraine (Donetsk and Zaporozhye), but I do think that this will be resolved in the near future).
- Four territories held referenda to express their desire to join Russia. The right of people to self-determine is enshrined in UN Article 1, and Russia’s acceptance of the four territories is in line with the international law and UN Article 1.
- This step was necessary to protect historic Russian population that have been shelled since 2014, and were denied their culture, language and identity by Ukraine post 2014 Maidan.
- Russia has endured a number of interventions from the collective west, starting in 17th century (Poland), with the most recent after the 1917 revolution. Russia has persevered and won.
- In 1990s, after the USSR dissolution, that was progressed despite overwhelming opposition by the population of USSR during the referendum, the collective West tried to take Russia apart and gain control of her natural resources, while referring to Russia as a partner.
- USA have been acting as a hegemon, dividing the rest of the world into their friends (vassals) and the rest – countries and peoples that were treated as colonies, allowing the USA to collect “hegemon tax”.
- USA have ruled the world based on the set of rules that they have established themselves – who gave them this right?
- The West have engaged in a policy of colonisation since 15th century. Many native peoples, nations were decimated, including American Indians, Chinese through opium wars.
- Now the USA has resorted to destroying strategic assets owned by international actors, while denying any involvement. One has to ask – who is responsible? The answer is, whomever benefits the most is the one responsible.
- Now the USA is pushing forward with woke agenda. Russia has two genders, not some other genders. Russia doesn’t need Parent 1, Parent 2, Parent 3. Russia will live according to its culture, religious beliefs and traditional values.
- “One thing that I want to point out – things will not go on the same way they were before” (I think that was the only statement pointed at the collective West, I’m recording this from memory, might not be the actual quote).
- People of the four areas have come back to the Russia’s fold, and we will protect them with everything we have.
- Russia is always open to negotiations and are ready to go back to the negotiating table, albeit under a different set of conditions that were discussed in April.
No doubt, we will have analysis and dissecting of the statements in the days to come. This is my take on the speech, and I a not a political analyst, a think tank shark, or anything else of sort. But I thought the speech was to the point. It certainly had its patriotism moments, but overall it was balanced, called a lot on the Russian history rather than rah-rah statements, and did not come across as speeches in certain other countries, both historical and current, declaring exceptionalism and primacy of one country / nation over others.
As to the next steps and developments, this one is tricky. There have been reports that Ukraine was trying hard as hell, regardless of losses, to take Liman in DNR prior to the declaration of reunification to deliver a blow in information war against Russia. So far, despite heavy losses, Liman is holding. With the events of today, it will be interesting to watch how the events unfold.
Finally, I have come across a certain Telegram channel, in Russian, t.me/resident_ua – google translate is your friend, although sometimes the slang used makes it hard to decipher, but ~90% of the message gets through. I have only been following it for a week or so. This channel posits itself as reporting internal workings of the Office of the President (OP) of Ukraine. I have no idea as to authenticity of the claim, but lots of things being reported are spot on (remember, my experience is one week old, so pinch of salt).
In the last couple of days it was reported that (again, in no particular order):
- Zelensky gave orders to take Liman, no matter the losses.
- Zelensky is upset that the West is giving media space to his head general Zaluzhny, as it looks like he might be hand-picked to lead the country if Zelensky falls out of favour.
- MI-6, back in June/July, informed the OP that use of tactical nuclear weapons have been discussed in the Kremlin at least twice.
- MI-6 warned the OP that Putin’s speech will contain an ultimatum to Ukraine that if it doesn’t surrender, Russia will destroy its power generation sector in two weeks, after which it will resort to the use of tactical nuclear weapons (Putin’s speech did not have anything to this effect – part reason I wanted to listen to see if MI-6 claims were legit).
- USA have transferred a number of US officers, under the guise of private mercenaries, to Germany to direct Ukrainian war efforts. This, effectively, means that the hybrid war is real, and mission control centre is moving from Kiev to Berlin, rendering Zelensky and Zaluzhny obsolete.
May we live in interesting times!
liman still holding out is a bullish indicator for the russians. in reality it shows how retarded both sides have been in this war:
russia- for allowing this to happen by not calling up more men and reserves far earlier than they have done, which would have prevented ukraine’s s urprise offensive in kharkov for getting as far as it has.
and ukraine, for, despite all their numerical bulk, being incapable of taking some irrelevant hamlet. the lyman garrison is apparently about 500 men large (supported by forces outside of it) vs. an army of about 6000 or so ukranians, every attack thus far has been repelled. i expect it to fall soon, but this has been a remarkable defensive operation for the allied forces vs the ukranians.
along with the failure of the kherson offensive it shows how you can come to conclude that russia’s losses are much greater than ukraine’s in this war. whenever the russians or the allied militias dig in and defend the ukranians seemingly cannot get past them.
i listened to the speech, i like how he called out western dick chopping in it.
i dont believe the power grid rumours at all, but we will see given the annexation is seemingly a game changer. as far as russian law is concerned now ukraine is the invader, not russia, and it is encroaching on russian territory itself. so this could mean a green-light to start targetting civilian infrastructure like the UKR power grid
it’s notable though that the UKR power grid is operating at extreme over-capacity and has been since 1991. ukr’s power grid was built by the soviet union to handle a super industrialised region that mass produced steel and ships etc, post 1991 ukraine has been a hollowed out deindustrialised shithole, and post the war its now super depopulated. so the power grid has heaps of capacity to spare, meaning it’ll be really hard to destroy it if the russians try to.
wrt to Ruski apparent siliness and indecisiveness, The Nebulator seems to explains it well and this holds water even from historic perspective
https://t.me/thenebulator/792
thanks mark
i find you most trustworthy than other media
would be good to have a russian speaker amongst us, but alas
http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/69465
translated to anglo
probably will need a vpn
https://kremlin-ru.translate.goog/events/president/news/69465?_x_tr_sch=http&_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp
oops, no actual translation, here’s machine translated.
en text link censored by thy ISP.
disect as you please.
my view is that accession is actually not good for many reasons, and the better path would be a Taiwanisation (claim of the new Territory to be representing the full Territory of UA). In short this legalises the right or Russian regions to break away from Russia.
Anyway… above is the view from my chair sipping the Chateaux de Chateaux vintage 1976 with some caviar from St. Petersburg and reality may be separated from my vantage point.
http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/69465
No need, the Russians are happy to tell you in English.
The Americans would have to execute a Apollo style effort to get Biden to make a similar speech.
“The Americans would have to execute a Apollo style effort to get Biden to make a similar speech.”
You’d have to have plenty of time to listen to it….he’d need a 15 minute nap between some of the longer paragraphs.
can you open that link without the VPN?
I cannot without.
Yep, can do, although I note sometimes the Kremlin site is a bit slow to load.
Might depend on ISP due to all the free speech we’re drowning in. I know Europe has heavily censored Russian sites.
Use google DNS
…”so let me summarise as a professional translator for 10+ years. He states, as he has done from the outset, what his intentions and complaints are in the plainest terms possible.”…
Long Twitter thread.
https://mobile.twitter.com/KonstantinKisin/status/1575853684852150272
http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/69465
The Russians have an English version of the Kremlin site.
Beware, that Konstantin is opposed to the whole war; I gather that translation is reasonably accurate but may as well get it from the horse’s mouth.
Agreed. Thanks for that. I’ll have a read. Fked, but no surprise it’s not in MSM.
This is the speech at the signing of the accession treaties….is this the one you’re looking for?
Signing of treaties on accession of Donetsk and Lugansk people’s republics and Zaporozhye and Kherson regions to Russia
http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/69465
Also here:
‘Russia will always be Russia’: Putin’s full speech on accession of former Ukrainian territories
https://www.rt.com/russia/563827-putin-speech-colonial-west/
Oh, stuff the spam filter!
Speech here:
‘Russia will always be Russia’: Putin’s full speech on accession of former Ukrainian territories
https://www.rt.com/russia/563827-putin-speech-colonial-west/
Also here:
Signing of treaties on accession of Donetsk and Lugansk people’s republics and Zaporozhye and Kherson regions to Russia
http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/69465
Top post, Gruppenführer!
Jawohl!
Back in after spending a glorious spring day out and aboot (to all of our canuck friends out there).
Coming, appreciate the kind words, I just relay facts or opinions, and label the latter as such unlike the MSM that passes opinions as facts.
Now onto the subject at hand. The annexation/occupation/seisure/return to Motherland of the 4 territories has got to be one of the most newsworthy items of the last day. Yet, crickets in AU media.
My local rag – nothing (online edition). I checked Yahoo.au – nothing, except a couple of stories that Putin is about to die from some sort of debilitating disease, and that he is loosing ™.
Wonder why that is? Even Zerohedge relegated the story that was top last night to page 3. Is this because they/them are afraid of the narrative that a losing country suddenly got 5M new citizens? So if one doesn’t speak about it, it never happened?
Hundred of thousands of Europeans protesting. Crickets from EZFKA MSM. You only find out about this on alternative media.
I’m seeing squat on the Nordstream debacle too. Everyone knows the US did it – its being memory holed.
lol, sucked in euro wieners.
On the NS1 & NS2 sabotage, I found this interesting tidbit:
I certainly wasn’t aware of this arrangement, anyone familiar with terms & conditions of the long-term contracts?
Source: https://thesaker.is/germany-and-eu-have-been-handed-over-a-declaration-of-war/ by Pepe Escobar
“Take or pay” is quite common in resource contracts.
It would not be unusual for such a provision to be in the Russian gas contract.
However, Germany could probably slide out from under using “Force Majeure”, if such a clause is incorporated in the contract, which it almost certainly would.
“Force Majeure” is a provision which “essentially frees both parties from liability or obligation when an extraordinary event or circumstance beyond the control of the parties, such as a war, strike, riot, crime, epidemic or sudden legal changes prevents one or both parties from fulfilling their obligations under the contract.”
Of course, there could be a lawyers picnic over whether the SMO constituted “war”, or whether sanctions imposed by a third party (US) or the EU constituted a “sudden legal change”.
It may well be that Russia could now be facing “failure to deliver” penalties, and may have to rely on “Force Majeure” itself, in light of the pipeline problems.
Oh, to be a lawyer 🙂
plaguerat,
Thanks! While I’m fairly well versed in contract T&Cs in infrastructure space, I haven’t heard of TOP clauses before – just not applicable with a bridge 😀
As to force majeure, this is a funny situation, isn’t it? NS2 was never cleared by the German side to start operating, so no issues there. NS1, however, was operational, that is until the Siemens turbines were sanctioned by Germany / Canada, which started the sordid mess in the western MSM of Putin using gas supply as an energy weapon against the free world ™.
In case with the sabotage, already admitted as such by Denmark, Germany, USA, etc., it raises an interesting point – was sabotage included in the force majeure clause? Usually it is not, and especially given the location (I would have thought it could be included in Middle East or Africa). The sabotage itself was not a result of “war, strike, riot, crime, epidemic or sudden legal changes“. NS1 was operational and delivered gas just fine for months after the SMO started.
Now the plan is for the USA, Germany and Denmark to conduct an investigation of these acts of sabotage. Funny thing is, the owner of the pipeline wasn’t included in this investigation. At the UN Security Council, Russian Permanent Representative to the United Nations specifically called for four countries to take part in the investigation: USA, Germany, Denmark and Russia. Yet, it is fairly clear that the guilty party has been selected (one just needs to remember other proven facts of Russia being a bad actor – US election meddling, MH 17, Novichok, etc.).
Biden said over the weekend: “Don’t listen what Putin is saying, what he is saying we know it’s not true.” He also warned Putin directly that NATO will defend every inch of its territory, and that nobody in the world will recognise the sham referenda. And more sanctions on the way, because previous rounds of sanctions worked so well.
Don’t know if you caught the developments from Zelensky right after Putin’s speech, where he, on camera, signed a document requesting an expedited process for the Ukraine to be admitted to NATO. And the aftermath – Stoltenberg said no, as NATO is not a part of the Ukraine conflict and don’t really want to get tangled up in it (especially if you believe some western pundits – I think it was Wa Po claiming that the EU are running low on weapons stockpiles and have no more Soviet stuff to ship to Ukraine). White House said no. Looks like Zelensky have fulfilled his role?
One of these days you may receive the reply I just posted to you that has now disappeared into Spamland,
Very frustrating to have considerable preparation disappear…..again.
Arrgh! Appreciate the effort, looking forward to the response.
Just found this…….a handy explainer of both terms in the real world:
Take or Pay contracts in the mining and energy sectors – a double-edged sword?
https://www.mondaq.com/australia/mining/282052/take-or-pay-contracts-in-the-mining-and-energy-sectors–a-double-edged-sword
https://bigserge.substack.com/p/the-war-has-just-begun
Winter is coming.
Big Serge sounds a little deluded. Just LOL at the idea of Russia possibly capturing the entire east half of Ukraine. They were repelled from Kharkiv and after 7 months fled for their lives.
The only people that are deluded are the ones that think Ukraine will win this war. The only way the will ever win is if the west goes in and we all know what that means…
Ukraine doesn’t have to win just turn it into a stalemate and waste 300k reservist suckers.
That will be the next step the yanks will send troops and their best weaponry into Ukraine to defend it if it seems Ukraine can’t keep Russia at bay. The yanks couldn’t give a fuck what Russia sends Europe’s way.
Putin is a bit of a toothless tiger. He’s basically begging for Ukraine to come to the negotiating table at this point.
LOL, I am sure you’re just trying to be the anti-contrist (the silhouette of Reus?).
Oh dear…
https://youtu.be/Ds8enLwEflQ
Trolling of this sort doesn’t get old
NSW about to poison Australia’s meat supply with MRNA shit
https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/about-us/media-centre/releases/2022/ministerial/nsw-fast-tracks-mrna-fmd-and-lumpy-skin-disease-vaccines
it will make me a vegetarian for sure.. heading that direction anyway for reasons completely different from that of your regular Karens.
Chinese import meat, allovasudden, sounds like a healthy proposition
red lyman has been evacuated, i suspected it would have fallen either today or tomorow. this is the power of raw numbers, ukraine has 20,000 men or so in that sector against a much smaller russian force.
Russia’s losing. It’s becoming a debacle. The yanks blew up their Nord Stream pipes and Putin did nothing about it. Didn’t even bother with more threats of firing off nukes because he’s all talk no action at this point.
I really wanted Putin to win but it’s becoming embarrassing for him now. Hopefully he sends a few nukes to London still.
Lol
we will see whether the mobilisation will make a difference, i find it difficult to believe it will not
i am not repeating what i have written before 15 times another time
but yes as of now, they are definitely losing
The war will last as long as the US keeps funding it. So far the US has spent $80b in 7 months and is still writing cheques. The main opposition to funding the war is from Trump aligned republicans. My view is that the US midterms will decide the outcome of the war.
Good call. If Democrats suffer big losses in both Houses then his Bills will be stopped, no more throwing cash, mercenaries and arms at Zelensky.
Afghanistan and Iraq were $4.3 trillion. This new war is good value for the US. Putin is basically Hitler in the eyes of the average yank or Aussie.
lol this is almost as amusing as watching MB mental gymnastics over the last decade as sydney house prices soared 150%
This failed war could legitimately lead to the collapse of the entire country of Russia
Who would have known that predictions from a 25yo from Dubbo who has played a few games of Civilization IV , and gets his military intelligence from 4chan , were not going to be that accurate
Here’s my question for you:
Does Russia not have a standing army?
If so, what are they doing currently?
Why was there such a small force to begin with, and why are they now getting conscripts – where the fuck is the rest of the army?
i do not read 4chan at all bc its garbage
i don’t even like anime it’s the worst
people who play the civ games would probably a better grasp of military strategy than most aus commenttors btw, including mick ryan; they would actually understand the importance of manpower and the number of units you have
i literally said that red lyman would fall weeks ago, including in my first post in this thread, so how have my predictions failed
all my predictions have been based around manpower, which is why kharkov happened
russia has an army comprised of conscripted reserves and active contractors
the force used in ukraine initially was about 175k, but that includes the LPR/DPR/Rosvgardia (which is the russian military police), the actual number of actual contracted soldiers it deployed is unknown, but i think it was about 75-100K
russia’s initial, failed strategy, like i said in my post MONTHS AGO (go read it), was a high risk retard strat to induce a rapid surrender at an absolute minimimum of cost
putin was hoping the ukranians would roll over and just not fight, and frankly for the first week or two, that’s what seems to have been happening
i do not believe kyiv was a feint, like i said in my post MONTHS AGO (go read it), like a lot of the copers were saying, it was a high risk gamble that didn’t work, so they withdrew from that front bc they had no hope of taking the city with the small force they had around it, UNLESS ukraine just didn’t resist
ukraine didn’t, they mobilised a huge force of conscripts
the army it is bringing in is the reserves; it could not legally use the reserves bc they can only be used to defend russia proper, bc the ‘war’ was initially defined as a special military operation, it was effectively an expeditionary war
now that russia is 3 days away from legally recognising Zaproachia/Kherson/Donetsk/Lugansk as part of russia proper, legally russian soil, russia can actually deploy its reserves
why do you think they just did that lmao
putin is a trained lawyer (that’s actually his educational background; look it up), i don’t think anyone actually knows this, the guy is a legalistic sperg and will never do anything that isn’t formally on the books first
the reserves are called up every year and given training as conscripts
note however, that it is a wrong assumption to assume that all of these men are going to be fighting, or are even going to ukraine at all
many of them will be swapping out duties with russia’s regular army, the contracted forces, and will likely be deployed to various points to defend russia’s borders/russia proper
russia isn’t going to move its whole fkn army into ukraine lmao, especially not with the potential for NATO counter-attack which seems unlikely to us but that is irrelevant if putin is worried about it; all that matter is going on in his and his general staff’s mind
the contracted forces give or take are about ~1m, probably
the reserves it can activate and deploy are about ~2m, but that
the rosgvardia about ~300k
note these numbers don’t necessarily all mean fighting forces/active forces, admin personel etc included as well
the decision to attack ukraine with the force they did from the start was a huge blunder. they should have mobilised after lysychansk fell (july 1 or so), if they did that by the time of the kharkov offensive they would be moving in huge forces and dispersing them into various defensive roles, which would have most certainly thrwarted the ukranians in kharkov
though still better late than never
my only failed prediction thus far has been that i thought that it was reasonable that russia could win with the deployed force it had in ukraine at all, just very slowly
something putin clearly also thought
after kharkov happened i saw that was wrong and they absolutely needed more manpower, and the situation was now getting critical; i was skeptical putin was even going to mobilise given autists are so inflexible in their thinking, but then he went and surprised me and mobilised what is a shockingly large force
all my other predictions have actually come true (such as my repeated insistence on manpower, over and oevr) or are thus far, not tested
i love also how u seem to think these are MY predictions, lmao
as though im coming up with all of this myself, i’m reading and synthesising these points from people way smarter than me, most of them critics of russia’s war on the russian side
there’s no shortage of them
im not even a russioboo lol i think russia is honestly a shithole, ive been there and its not a good country, ukraine is a lot worse tho
Didn’t you also say at the start Russia would roll over Ukraine in a few weeks?;-)
FWIW I agree with you in general terms that Putin is clearly all in on winning this now, so that is the likely outcome.
Hard to see Ukraine ‘winning’ this war by any definition of winning.
Best case they lose the annexed regions and everyone calls it a day and Zelensky keeps his job.
thats literally what i said in my post just then, i absolutely thought the same thing everyone seemed to also think, i thought ukraine would not fight and just ‘lie down like a dead dog’ (think i said exactly that)
they didn’t, i didn’t realise just the scope of their insanity or NATO’s obsession with co-opting the whole country as an intermediary to kill russian soldiers, boris johnson personally sabotaged the peace talks that were making progress in instabul
Even with extra troops, I can’t see Russia winning whilst the US keeps funding Ukraine. Even if Russia gets the upper hand and takes territory, the US and NATO won’t recognise it and will ensure a peace agreement is not signed. Plus Russia will not want to occupy northern and western Ukraine anyway. So the US will just provide weapons to be launched from these areas.
the u.s funding merely allows ukraine to supply its soldiers, but those soldiers are only able to succeed if the force ratios massively favour them like they did in kharkov. look at kherson as a counter measure to see the proof of this. aus media never talked about what happened in kherson because it is so embarassing; probably like 6-10k ukranians dead to capture maybe two villages over the ingulets river. where the force ratios are close to 1:1 ukraine flails badly.
it took ukraine probably like 10 conseuctive attacks to finally force the russians in lyman to withdraw, it is very clear to anybody which is the more effective army in the country on a soldier to soldier basis.
russia could win the war in a week if it wanted to, but putin doesn’t have the stomach for it: destroy ukraines entire power grid. it would not be easy and take a lot of missiles/bombing runs but it can be done. it would mean tens/hundreds of thousands of ukranian civilians would die which putin is too soft to ever initiate but it would definitely cause the country to collapse.
lol just stirring you m8
I love reading these kind of sperg-outs though
I find it hard to believe that Putin could have failed so miserably
If you are going to launch an invasion, you need to put your best effort behind it precisely because you want it to be done quickly
Perhaps he thought that mobilising a larger force would be too obvious, but the CIA was claiming that putin was about to invade for months before it happened so obviously the allied forces were already aware of what was going to happen
your claim that he didn’t want to leave the borders elsewhere undefended doesn’t really hold water because nobody is about to launch a ground invasion of russian territory
also, this has been going on for 8 months – did it take him 8 months to realise he wasn’t winning?
Doesn’t make any sense imo. Reeks of desperation at this point
I reckon they are fucked because regardless of numbers or whatever the military and Putin are obviously completely inept
putin has asperger syndrome i think it is almost certain so take that what you will
he is an inflexible and highly inscrutable man
i don’t find it credible that somebody who had the wits, cunning, charm and interpersonal skills to become the wealthiest and most powerful man on earth has asperger’s syndrome
have you seen jeff bezos, elon musk or bill gates at all
dont know about the other two but elon absolutely has autism
chuck in mark zuckerberg in there too
none of those things apply to politics
And putin’s entire rise has been political
Who is the last successful politician with Asperger’s
adolf hitler
angela merkel imo also
i really dont think politicians actually have to be charming, look at every aus pm in the last 20 years or so lol
do you think albo is charming
he’s a fucking nerd who looks like he got picked on in HS
politix is showbiz for ugly / uncool ppl who were too ugly and uncool to make it in showbiz
exempting people like hitler and mussolini who actually were cool imo just in their own alien men against the world sort of way
albo and bilbo shorten aer absolute blackholes of charisma
scomo is shrek tier
etc
*successful* politicians
they have to climb the greasy pole in private
not saying they have to be charismatic in interviews or on camera, most of them are dog shite
but you don’t get nominated to be party leader without understanding intricacies of interpersonal relationships
“also, this has been going on for 8 months – did it take him 8 months to realise he wasn’t winning?”
they were winning in the sense that they were taking territory at a slow but steady pace until kharkov almost definitely bro
ukraine wasnt doing shit and their talked up kherson offensive has resulted in huge losses for them
why do you think ukraine disappeared from the australian media cycle around july after lysychansk was captured by russia
If Russia rallied 300-400k troops at the start it would have been impossible to call it a special military operation, when it would be the largest force mobilisation since the Iraq war, which was a war. It would obviously have been a war.
Second is they underestimated Ukraine’s willingness to fight back as evidenced by hubris of the initial Kyiv offensive, and moreover the entire resistance.
Agreed though it’s bit a blunder given that it was obvious they needed more forces deployed 4 months ago.
You never know what strings Putin had to pull internally also to ask for 400k troops at the start. Maybe it was too much politically even for him. Consensus on 100k was probably easier to reach.
Now he can say with 100k we are getting nowhere we need 300-400k to win etc.
My 2c.
This bloke has written my thoughts exactly here
“Putin, very simply, could not have conducted a large scale mobilization at the onset of the war. He possessed neither a coercive mechanism nor the manifest threat to generate mass political support. Few Russians would have believed that there was some existential threat lurking in the shadow – they needed to be shown, and the west has not disappointed. Likewise, few Russians would likely have supported the obliteration of Ukrainian infrastructure and urban utilities in the opening days of the war.”
https://bigserge.substack.com/p/politics-by-other-means
OT
dementia joins the list of jabbadabba sideeffects, blame to be put on the “infection”. As with other side effects, no cross referencing of dementia amongst purebloods… as it may point the finger in the direction where no fingers can be pointed.
https://www.smh.com.au/national/does-contracting-covid-make-you-more-likely-to-develop-dementia-20220928-p5bll1.html
Good to see the Australian media is taking it well, look at the headline and drab serious looks on Albo and medical puppet. Narrative stays on point…
Peak Australia and pretty much the west was in the 80s/90s. Society has largely regressed since then. On the plus side, you are seeing the fall of an empire at a rate of knots.
Start of the decline was the global war on terror launched in 2001, as a stimulus program to save the US and global markets from tech crash of 2000. It worked a treat for the MIC and its shareholders, and for the politicians, but didn’t do much for the populace.
Putin calling out the satanists…
‘Based’ Putin
Yep, I’m as fit as fiddle and Covid free. Meanwhile, my missus and all of her colleagues, my kids, their partners, my sister and all her family and a majority of my ex colleagues have all been triple vaxxed, and they’ve all had the Rona.
Safe and effective!
Add in the EU as the frauds. They are supposed to have tools at their disposal should she win. We are only democratic should our preferred globalist win. Hoping more countries follow Italy.
Meloni is a total fraud. Supported digital identity and mandates. Funding and associated with Bill Gates. Also a massive Zionist.
Just another fake kosherservative selling copium to normies. No one is coming to save us.
Maybe so, but at the moment she appears to be better than Macron, or Merkel, or Johnson, or Truss, or Biden, or Albanese, or Adern, or Trudeau or a lot of others.
I’m cautiously enthusiastic at the moment. I’d also like her to have my babies.
Remember this picture?
Now do the Bolsheviks and the current Ukrainian and US leadership and what tribe they are from.
Nazi is boomer tier shit.
I knew those blacks were transphobic!
Old link but seems prescient:
https://audittheempire.com/04-29-19/
crimean bridge fkt over
so the intransigent putin now has to organise an alternative supply line for crimea
gtfo of dnipro and anywhere east of dnipro
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Crimea+bridge&ia=web&iaxm=about
https://twitter.com/generalsvr_en/status/1578652210816176128
top-level Crimean officials have been advised to move their families and movable property to “any safe region of #Russia“. The Bryansk, Kursk, Belgorod, Voronezh and Rostov regions are not considered safe. The #Kremlin believes the situation in #Crimea could “worsen”.