Long Weekend Links April 2-5, 2021

Globalist philosophy that has conquered the West cannot tolerate the existence of competing ideologies of philosophies. Essentially the competitive exclusion principle, also referred to as Gause’s law, guarantees that the West will come into conflict with China.

As with nature when two or more species inhabit the same environmental niche, using and competing for the same resources, then one of them will be driven to extinction. It is the same for societies and cultures.

In many ways WW2 was a war by Globalist bankers against sovereign ethnic nations and their ability to use their own society and economy to project their own social values forward into the future. If you examine the West today their societies have been corrupted, much like a Field Ant nest is gradually taken over by the Wood Ants. When the Field Ant elites are replaced, all the resources of the Field Ant nest are then used to help the Wood Ants take over and replace it, using the Field Ant’s own resources to destroy themselves.

Govt lead social policies that are innately hostile to our existing societies ability to use our own resources to project our own social and cultural values forward into the future, such as Multiculturalism and the pursuit of replacement levels of immigration from cultures and population groups entirely alien, if not hostile, to our own suggest that this is the reality of the West.

While notionally these policies are promoted as ‘good’ in order to create a sense of ‘global brotherhood’ and shared sense of purpose, and supposedly dissolving individual nations ‘artificial’ identities into a plural cultural democracy, the reality however is that it will instead result in an atomised global population, with no sense of a united identity sufficiently capable of resisting top down rule. If you have ever wondered what one of the purposes of identity politics is, it that by creating a myraid and multitude of identities for people to adopt, it helps prevent enough social cohesion to ever form to oppose the rule by elites.

One of the biggest advantages of monotheism was the ability of a society to create a society with shared common values and identity, that is better placed to solve the economic problem i.e. ‘what needs and wants need to be satisfied and in what order, using the limited resources we have available. This provided monothistic religious societies a unique advantage over multi-deity societies, and is why imho, they came to dominate and conquer these other multi-deity religions and societies.

In a way what Multiculturalism in a secular society is, is a reverse back to pre-monothism religion days. Such societies as a whole will be severely weakened, while the only groups that will actually flourish in such a society will be individual religious groups, some of which are obviously already far better experienced and equipped with the established cultural values to deal with such a future.

Ironically, the biggest losers under Multiculturalism, in the long term, are those pushing for it most heartily ie our secular society – they will be out breed, out politiced and compete with better resourced religious groups.

Essentially there are only 3 ‘population groups’ remaining on earth that pose any possible threat to Globalists Bankers and their desire to homogenize the Earth’s culture. Africa poses not threat, nor does South America – Africa is a perennial basket case while South America is already very diverse and consequently already extremely stratified. Likewise India and rest of that band of the subcontinent is already in the preferred discombobulated state – India is among the most multicultural society in the world already, so it already represents the ideal Globalist society.

That basically leaves Europeans, Anglo-Saxon nations, and East Asia and of course Globalist bankers.

The Wood Ant queen has already largely conquered the Anglo-Saxon nations, of the UK, US, Aust, Canada, and NZ. The adoption of MultiCult, the replacement levels of immigration and the fact that demographics is destiny almost make this a fait accompli. Having conquered the major cities in the US, the new focus on migration is rural and bringing ‘diversity’ to the countryside. If this should occur, then there is no chance those nations will never maintain a similar demographic profile as they have now in the future. Cities are population sinks and eternally renewed from the countryside, and if a culture or society loses control of the countryside it is game over – permanently.

Western Europe has suffered much the same fate as the Anglo-Saxon nations (more evidence the Globalist bankers won the war) and the wound of MultiCult is well on the way to ensure victory there too. Merkle’s 1 million Syrian migrants is arguably the worst decision ever made in terms of negative impact on European women’s freedom, safety and well being – ironic that was a decision MADE by a woman. This isn’t just me thinking this, a leading feminist  Ayaan Hirsi Ali stated it.

That just leaves Eastern Europe, Hungry, Poland, and of course Russia. These nations are all much more aware of the implications of mass migration and the existential threats it poses, having a long history of being at the leading edge of mass invasions into Europe from Asia and the middle east in the past.

Russia has long been a big thorn in the side of Globalist bankers. The Rus, being white Russians from the North of Russia, have a long history of kicking out invaders. They broke up the Khazar empire, an early proto-type of a multicultural empire, and although initially conquered by the Bolshiviks in 1917, Russia slipped through the bankers hands after coming down on the wrong side of the new world order following WW2. With misrule, demographics and emigration of ‘oppressed’ population groups the local Rus eventually regained control, although over a much diminished society and culture.

However, outside of Russia and Easter Europe, the only remaining nations on earth that remain capable of using their own society and economies to project their own culture and philosophies forward into the future, in conflict with the globalist bankers, are East Asian, namely Japan, Korea and of course China.

While Japan and Korea have been under intense pressure to adopt MultiCult and massively increase immigration levels, they so far have been fairly recalcitrant. Given enough time and the demographic terminator meme that central banking results in, it is possible that they will eventually concede, but in terms of world importance they are unlikely to be able to challenge the existing hegemon.

That just leaves China. IMHO China realises what is taking place, their actions to transform the cultures of Uyghur China and Tibet show that they both understand this reality and are actively seeking to bring it into being. They supposedly want to project Chinese influence into space, and it has even been suggested that COVID was experimentation on viruses that can actively target certain population groups, in order to create ‘living space’ for Chinese people to move into… sound familiar?

So in my opinion and applying the forbidden lens, I believe that conflict with China is now inevitable. The question then arises who will initiate it?

Personally with the election of Biden I think the chances have now significantly escalated the possibility of conflict with China. The core elements of Trumpism, was American nationalism. It was an inward looking Jacksonian America centric view of the world. Trump committed the unpardonable sin of focusing of existing Americans and resisting the transformation, however slight, of America ‘becoming’ the new MultiCult client banker state (in truth I think they, like the rest of the Anglo nations are too far gone).

After looking at the Anchorage ‘trade’ discussions between China and the US, it was apparent that the US was completely caught off guard by Chinese recalcitrance to US lecturing and posturing.

IMHO the neo-elites in the US are filled with hubris. Having dispatched Trump they view themselves as the new undisputed rightful global rulers. They see themselves as both morally superior with their global ideals, and that their success is an inevitable part of their manifest destiny to rule the world. The believe the will bring global peace and a new world order by dissolving ‘artificial’ notions of separate social and cultural identity, and achieve the goal of universal brotherhood. The only real threat to the realisation of this goal remains China. The white negros of Russia have been conquered once before, the West and most of Europe are in the process of ‘becoming’, Japan and Korea are too far along the demographic decline to pose any real threat, only China remains, yet the demographic sword hangs above its head too.

As is the way with the Banking cult, their claims to righteousness demands that history doesn’t see them as the initiators of any conflict – this will be to guarantee their that they can be seen to be on the side of justice. My guess is that they will subtly encourage the Chinese to become embolden enough to attack and seize Taiwan at some point in the near future, before the demographic window closes on China’s ability to resist the global hegemon. If China falls for their trap, like Germany fell for the trap of reacting to the outrages and atrocities being committed in Poland, then they will force China’s hand through sanctions and embargos. Just as the US forced Japan’s hand at the start of the Pacific war in WW2 by blockading Japan’s fuel supplies, I imagine something similar will occur if China eventually seizes Taiwan.

If this occurs, then well, I think it is all over for mankind. A genocidal banking cult filled with hubris at seeing complete global domination within its grasp, is likely to severely underestimate the reaction of the Chinese and their determination and resoluteness to see distinct 4,000 year old Imperial Chinese Sino values perpetuated into the future, and will instead be prepared to burn the earth to the ground, rather than see should an alien philosophy and culture subjugate it.